CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting Agenda - Revised

Tuesday, March 10, 2026

Closed Session at 5:00 PM and Open Session at 6:00 PM

Council Chambers

1315 Valley Drive

Hermosa Beach, CA 90254

CITY COUNCIL
Mike Detoy, Mayor  
Michael D. Keegan, Mayor Pro Tem
Ray Jackson, Councilmember 
Dean Francois, Councilmember
Rob Saemann, Councilmember

David Pedersen, City Treasurer

APPOINTED OFFICIALS
Steve Napolitano, City Manager
Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney 

EXECUTIVE TEAM
Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director
Ann Yang, Interim City Clerk
Alison Becker, Community Development Director
Lisa Nichols, Parks and Recreation Director
Landon Phillips, Police Chief 
Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990 - To comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Assistive Listening Devices (ALD) are available for check out at the meeting. If you require special assistance to participate in this meeting, you must call or submit your request in writing to the Office of the City Clerk at [phone] or at at least 48 hours before the meeting. 

 

PARTICIPATION AND VIEWING OPTIONS  

Hermosa Beach City Council meetings are open to the public and are being held in person in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. Public comment is only guaranteed to be taken in person at City Hall during the meeting or prior to the meeting by submitting an eComment for an item on the agenda. As a courtesy only, the public may view and participate via the following: 

 

• Zoom: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89968207828? pwd=bXZmWS83dmxHWDZLbWRTK2RVaUxaUT092
• Phone: Toll Free: [phone]; Meeting ID: 899 6820 7828, then #; Passcode: 472825
• eComment:  Submit an eComment no later than three (3) hours before the meeting start time.
• Supplemental Email: Submit a supplemental email for agenda items only to [email protected]. Supplemental emails should indicate the agenda item and meeting date in the subject line and must be received no later than three (3) hours before the meeting start time. Emails received after the deadline but before the meeting ends will be posted to the agenda the next business day. Writings distributed to all, or majority of all, of the City Council after the agenda has been posted shall be available for inspection at the City Clerk's Office located at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 during regular business hours.

Please be advised that while the City will endeavor to ensure these remote participation methods are available, the City does not guarantee that they will be technically feasible or work all the time. Further, the City reserves the right to terminate these remote participation methods (subject to Brown Act restrictions) at any time and for whatever reason. Please attend in person or by submitting an eComment to ensure your public participation.  

 

Similarly, as a courtesy, the City will also plan to broadcast the meeting via the following listed mediums. However, these are done as a courtesy only and not guaranteed to be technically feasible. Thus, in order to guarantee live time viewing and/or public participation, members of the public shall attend in Council Chambers. 

 

• Cable TV: Spectrum Channel 8 and Frontier Channel 31 in Hermosa Beach 
• YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/CityofHermosaBeach90254 
• Live Stream: www.hermosabeach.gov/agenda
• Cablecast App: Available on supported devices and smart TVs

If you experience technical difficulties while viewing a meeting on any of our digital platforms, please try another viewing option. 

---

1.

CLOSED SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 5:00 PM

2.

ROLL CALL

3.

PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSED SESSION AGENDA

This Public Comment period is limited to Closed Session agenda items only. Public Comment is limited to three (3) minutes per speaker.

4.

RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION

4.a

MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session held on February 3, 2026.

4.b

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: EXISTING LITIGATION

Pursuant to California Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1)
Name of Case: City of Hermosa Beach v. Independent Cities Risk Management Authority
Case Number: 22TRCV00700

4.c

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR

Pursuant to California Government Code section 54957.6
City Negotiator: Tyler Cashman, Interim Human Resources Manager
Organizations: Teamsters, Professional and Medical Employees’ Union, Local 986
Hermosa Beach Police Officers' Association

5.

OPEN SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM

6.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

7.

ROLL CALL

8.

CLOSED SESSION REPORT

9.

ANNOUNCEMENTS—UPCOMING CITY EVENTS

10.

APPROVAL OF AGENDA

This is the time for the City Council to discuss any changes to the order of agenda items.

• Recommended Action:

  To approve the order of the agenda.

11.

PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS

11.a

PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING RED CROSS MONTH

11.b

PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING WOMEN’S HISTORY MONTH

11.c

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT PRESENTATION ON THE SOUTH BAY CITIES MAIN TRUNK SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT

12.

PUBLIC COMMENT

Vanessa soltero

I want to bring to the attention of the citiy council of the efforts of one constituent that feels they need to share the need to involve the city attorney on Council person Jackson for not allowing comments on the invitation to hear the proposal tonite. Kent Allen has posted letters from himself and another business owner becasue he was unable to bother council person Jackson. I visit hermosa weekly, events and the beach are a part of life and to have residents go to these means to try to get a council person in trouble for not allowing comments from him are concerning on what protections are in place for the city council. It seems he has a lot of time on his hands and no one listens to his requests. Kent Allen needs to be addressed by this council on his behavior on social media and given a refresher course on the first amendment and possibly reading comprehension.

Anastasia Brien

I register my and my family's support to host the Nike After Dark Tour to take place in October. We are proud of Hermosa Beach's commitment to athleticism and inclusion, and we believe it would be an honor for our town to host such a meaningful event and reflect the very best of what Hermosa represents. I hope the city approves and welcomes this opportunity.

tonyhiggins

Re: HBPD Speeding Enforcement please click/tap on pdf link above if interested

This is the time for members of the public to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction and on items where public comment will not be taken (City Manager Reports, City Councilmember Comments, Consent Calendar items not pulled for separate discussion, and Future Agenda Items). If public comment is provided on a Public Hearing or Municipal Matter item, public comment on the same item will not be accepted when the item is heard at a later part of the meeting.

The public is invited to attend and provide public comment. Public comments are limited to three minutes per speaker from those present in City Council Chambers and via the remote participation options listed on the agenda. This time allotment may be modified due to time constraints at the discretion of the Mayor or City Council. 

No action will be taken on matters raised during public comment, except that the Council may take action to schedule issues raised during public comment for a future agenda. Speakers with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are encouraged to submit those comments directly to the City Manager. Members of the public will have a future opportunity to speak on items pulled from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion, Public Hearings, and Municipal Matters when those items are heard.

13.

CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS

14.

UPDATES ON CITY COUNCIL ACTIVITIES

This is the time for members of the City Council to report on their attendance at ad hoc subcommittees or standing committee meetings, conferences, or other official activities as City representatives. 

15.

CONSENT CALENDAR

The following matters will be acted upon collectively with a single motion and vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. Councilmembers may orally register a negative vote on any Consent Calendar item without pulling the item for separate consideration before the vote on the Consent Calendar. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember removes an item from the Consent Calendar, either under Approval of the Agenda or under this item before the vote on the Consent Calendar. Items removed for separate discussion will be provided a separate public comment period.

• Recommended Action:

  To approve the consent calendar.

15.a

WAIVE READING IN FULL OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ON THE AGENDA

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council waive reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions on the agenda and declare that said titles which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

15.b

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES

(Interim City Clerk Ann Yang)

15.c

CHECK REGISTERS - 26-AS-020

(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council receive and file the check registers for February 18, 2026 through February 26, 2026. The Administrative Services Director certifies the accuracy of the demands.

15.d

ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE PREPARATION OF A REPORT FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT DURING FY 2026–2027 - 26-PW-008

CEQA: Determine the resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines
(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Determine the resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378; and
  2. Adopt a resolution (Attachment 1) to approve the preparation of a report for the annual levy of assessments within the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District during Fiscal Year 2026–2027.

15.e

APPROVE THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ON-CALL STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE SERVICES WITH RON'S MAINTENANCE, INC - 26-PW-006

CEQA: Determine the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5).
(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Determine the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5).
  2. Approve the proposed amendment to the agreement with Ron’s Maintenance, Inc. for On-call Storm Drain Catch Basin Maintenance Services, extending the contract term through June 30, 2027, and increasing the total not-to-exceed contract amount from $173,351 to $218,632 (Attachment 2);
  3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to increase the annual project contingency from $10,000 to $15,000 per year for Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-27; and
  4. Authorize the City Manager to execute the proposed amendment, approve minor non-substantive modifications if necessary, and execute all related documents, with the City Clerk attesting the agreement subject to approval by the City Attorney.

15.f

ADOPT A RESOLUTION AND APPROVE THE INCREASE OF PROJECT CONTINGENCY TO CIP 630 COMMUNITY CENTER GAS LINE REPAIRS - 26-PW-010

CEQA: Determine that CIP 630, Community Center Gas Line Repairs, is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities)
(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Determine that CIP 630, Community Center Gas Line Repairs is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities);
  2. Adopt a resolution (Attachment 1) authorizing the increase in project contingency by $42,000 from $46,600 to $88,600 for CIP 630 Community Center Gas Line Repairs project for a total authorized amount of $321,600; and
  3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to approve contract change orders up to the approved project contingency amount.

*Removed reference to resolution 

15.g

APPROVE THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE JANITORIAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH XANADU SYSTEM SERVICES - 26-PW-007

CEQA: The action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5), as it consists of administrative activities that will not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment. The amendment pertains to ongoing custodial services within existing facilities.
(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Determine that the Second Amendment to the Janitorial Services Contract with Xanadu System Services is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 (b)(5) (administrative activities);
  2. Approve the second amendment to the agreement with Xanadu Service Systems for janitorial services, adding additional services for the remainder of Fiscal Year (FY) 25-26, extending the contract term through June 30, 2027, and increasing the total not-to-exceed contract amount from $651,696 to $895,313; (Attachment 1);
  3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to increase the established project contingency per year from $10,000 to $15,000 per year starting in FY 26-27; and
  4. Authorize the City Manager to execute the proposed amendment, approve minor non-substantive modifications if necessary, and execute all related documents, with the City Clerk attesting the agreement subject to approval by the City Attorney.

15.h

APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH THE ARC SOUTH BAY FOR USE OF COMMUNITY CENTER ROOMS 15 AND 17 - 26-PR-005

(Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Consider approval of a lease agreement (Attachment 1) with The Arc South Bay for use of the Community Center rooms 15 and 17 beginning April 1, 2026 through March 31, 2027 with the option, at staff’s discretion, to extend for two additional one-year terms; and
  2. Authorize the City Manager to execute and the City Clerk to attest, subject to approval by the City Attorney.

15.i

APPROVE A LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR SENATE BILL 84 DISABILITY ACCESS: CONSTRUCTION-RELATED ACCESSIBILITY CLAIMS: NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND OPPORTUNITY TO CORRECT - 26-CMO-010

Courtney Ryan

I strongly support accessibility and the principle that businesses should provide safe and inclusive access for residents and visitors of all abilities. At the same time, many small businesses face growing challenges navigating complex accessibility requirements while also managing the risk of costly litigation over technical violations. For this reason, I believe SB 84 represents a constructive step forward. The bill’s notice-and-cure framework gives small businesses a defined period to correct construction-related accessibility issues after receiving written notice, prioritizing the prompt removal of barriers while maintaining strong accessibility protections. However, SB 84 does not address an emerging concern for many small businesses: website accessibility complaints. Businesses are increasingly receiving legal demand letters related to website accessibility, often when they rely on third-party platforms or are unaware of technical deficiencies. Without addressing digital accessibility, there is a risk that litigation pressure may simply shift from physical accessibility claims to website-related claims. I respectfully encourage the City to consider supporting SB 84 while also advocating for future amendments or companion legislation that address website accessibility for small businesses, including a notice-and-cure process, clearer technical standards, and resources to help businesses improve accessibility proactively. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of this issue.

Michelle Crispin

Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Staff - On behalf of the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce, we appreciate the City’s leadership in considering accessibility reform legislation and understand that the Council is evaluating a letter of support for SB 84. Our Chamber strongly supports accessibility and the principle that businesses should provide safe and inclusive access for residents and visitors of all abilities. At the same time, many small businesses are facing increasing challenges navigating complex accessibility compliance requirements while also managing the risk of costly litigation over technical violations. For this reason, the Chamber believes SB 84 represents a constructive step forward. The bill’s notice and opportunity to cure framework provides small businesses with a defined period to correct construction-related accessibility issues after receiving written notice. This “fix-it-first” model prioritizes correcting barriers quickly while still preserving strong accessibility protections. However, we respectfully note that SB 84 does not address an emerging area of concern for many small businesses: website accessibility complaints. Small businesses are increasingly receiving legal demand letters related to website accessibility, even when those businesses rely on third party platforms or are unaware of technical deficiencies. Without addressing these digital accessibility concerns, there is a risk that litigation pressure may simply shift from physical accessibility claims to website related claims. For this reason, the Chamber respectfully encourages the City to consider supporting SB 84 while also advocating for future amendments or companion legislation that address website accessibility for small businesses, including: A notice and cure process for website accessibility issues similar to the framework proposed for construction-related claims Clear technical standards that small businesses can reasonably follow Educational and technical assistance resources to help businesses improve website accessibility proactively These recommendations are not intended to weaken accessibility protections. Rather, they are intended to ensure that reforms lead to meaningful accessibility improvements while giving small businesses a fair opportunity to identify and correct issues. We appreciate the City’s thoughtful consideration of this issue and its continued commitment to both accessibility and the sustainability of our local business community. Thank you for your consideration. Michelle Crispin President/CEO Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce & Visitors Bureau

(Senior Management Analyst Sara Russo)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council approve a letter of support for Senate Bill 84 (Attachment 1).

15.j

APPROVE A CONTRACT TO GEOSYNTEC FOR PROFESSIONAL STORMWATER CONSULTING SERVICES - 26-CMO-002

(Environmental Programs Manager Doug Krauss)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Geosyntec Consultants to develop a feasibility study for a dry well project at a not to exceed amount of $65,000 for a term of two years ending January 13, 2028, with an option to extend one year (Attachment 1); and
  2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the proposed agreements, and approve minor modifications if necessary, with the City Clerk attesting the proposed agreements and subject to approval by the City Attorney.

16.

PUBLIC HEARINGS—TO COMMENCE AT 6:30 P.M

16.a

APPROVAL OF IMPACT LEVEL III NEW SPECIAL EVENT – AFTER DARK TOUR LA 2026 - 26-PR-004

tonyhiggins

edit/sorry Dear City Council, There are many reasons this event is not a good fit for Hermosa. First and foremost the devil is always in the details and when Nike pitched this event to the Parks commission they could not answer any questions meaningfully about the following potential impacts: - 500 parking spaces on Hermosa Ave lost almost certainly leading to major parking problems for west side residents. Nike says additional parking will be provided but hasnt fefined a plan. Not only will the Hermosa Ave parking spots on both sides of Hermosa Ave Northbound be lost almost the entire length of the city and overflow into westside residential neighborhoods but many people who normally park on the south side of Hermosa ave will move their cars into these same residential neighborhoods. - Grandstands, DJs, platforms, amplified sound, port o’ potties, temporary lighting, tents, and vehicle bollards in westside residential neighborhoods AND approving this event without a clear understanding the neighborhood by neighborhood of the details is a dis-service to impacted residents. - Resident access to the beach and the Strand impacting the entire length of the city. What are the details. Exactly how will beach access and a walkway on the eastside of the strand be provided as Nike claims? Close Beach Drive? -A potential 10 p.m. to 4 a.m. event tear down in our neighborhoods. This is also possibly a bad fit because of our relationship with Sketchers and the fact that it may occur on the same weekend as the Sketchers Pier to Pier Charity Walk just adds injury to insult. This is a slippery slope where the city starts making a habbit of selling resident quality of life to the highest bidder and westside residents pay the price. i would support this event if Nike would make a substantial contribution on say 1 million dollars to a reputable charity like Breast Cancer Research. That would be worth the hassle and might bring the community together. Otherwise Vote No! tonyhiggins

tonyhiggins

Dear City Council, There are many reasons this event is not a good fit for Hermosa. First and foremost the devil is always in the details and when Nike pitched this event to the Parks commission they could not answer any questions meaningfully about the following potential impacts: - 500 parking spaces on Hermosa Ave lost almost certainly leading to major parking problems for west side residents. Nike says additional parking will be provided but hasnt fefined a plan. Not only will the Hermosa Ave parking spots on both sides of Hermosa Ave Northbound be lost almost the entire length of the city and overflow into westside residential neighborhoods but many people who normally park on the south side of Hermosa ave will move their cars into these same residential neighborhoods. - Grandstands, DJs, platforms, amplified sound, port o’ potties, temporary lighting, tents, and vehicle bollards in westside residential neighborhoods AND approving this event without understanding the neighborhood by neighborhood a clear understanding of specifics is a dis-service to impacted residents. - Resident access to the beach and the Strand impacting the entire length of the city. What are the details. Exactly how will beach access and a walkway on the eastside of the strand be provided as Nike claims? Close Beach Drive? -A potential 10 p.m. to 4 a.m. event tear down in our neighborhoods. This is also possibly a bad fit because of our relationship with Sketchers and the fact that it may occur on the same weekend as the Sketchers Pier to Pier Charity Walk just adds injury to insult. This is a slippery slope where the city starts making a habbit of selling resident quality of life to the highest bidder and westside residents pay the price. i would support this event if Nike would make a substantial contribution on say 1 million dollars to a reputable charity like Breast Cancer Research. That would be worth the hassle and might bring the community together. Otherwise Vote No! tonyhiggins

Courtney Ryan

I would like to express concern regarding the proposed Nike After Dark Tour event currently under consideration. -the scale of the event and anticipated road closures could create significant access limitations for many Hermosa Beach businesses during a typically busy afternoon and evening which could negatively impact our restaurants and retailers. -request that Nike and the event organizers engage directly with the Chamber prior to final approval to explore ways to better integrate Hermosa’s business community. -October 17–18 already includes two large events — the Skechers Friendship Walk and AAU Volleyball League matches — which would require the City to make an exception to its policy limiting the number of major events per day. The following weekend, October 24–25, may provide a more balanced operational fit. Thank you for your consideration.

Todd Tullis

Attachment 3 shows significant evolution since this was brought to the Parks & Recreation Commission on Feb 10. The producers are listening & responding to the concerns voiced thus far with changes to and new ideas for this event. While there's always a possibility an event goes poorly, it is worth the risks to give this event a try for its unique nature and potential benefits.

Jim Butler

This would be a big ask even for Skechers, let alone Nike which has no connection to this city. This seems to be a commercial activity, unlike the charitable intent of Friendship Walk. And the route/path is much more intrusive. Hassle for residents is much greater than any benefits to the city.

Jake Pike

We should be open to allowing large scale event programs as we have had it the past. This route however completely isolates the homeowners in the sand section. Complete closure and encapsulating residents is not allowed in many jurisdictions and should not be allowed. Many of the streets from 14th North willl be impacted and the residents will not be able to access their homes or leave if an emergency arises **. We have kids sports that take place in the fall and we should not be prevented from accessing our homes. I would support the event once a more detailed plan as how we will be able to enter and exit our homes in the sand section. The access issue should be a non-starter and there are plenty of ways to mitigate this problem. If you reroute using the northbound lanes you can provide access to all homes with the ability to have certain streets (22nd) being a rolling closure. It does have a solution.

Michelle Crispin

Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council, On behalf of the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce & Visitors Bureau, we would like to express concern regarding the proposed Nike After Dark Tour event currently under consideration. Based on the information provided, the scale of the event and anticipated road closures would create significant access limitations for many Hermosa Beach businesses during a typically busy afternoon and evening. The Chamber has not been contacted by Nike or event organizers to discuss how local businesses might be included through activations, partnerships, or other opportunities that could help offset this disruption. If the City is considering approval of this event, we respectfully request that Nike and the event organizers engage directly with the Chamber prior to final approval to explore ways to integrate Hermosa’s business community. In particular, we encourage consideration of: a spectator and activation zone at Pier Plaza with programming that directs visitors into the downtown district; daytime activations and partnerships with local businesses; opportunities for Hermosa businesses to participate through cheer zones or vendor activations; expanded hotel room blocks across Hermosa hotels; and a post-event economic impact assessment including merchant feedback. We also note that the currently proposed date of October 17 & 18 already includes two large regional events - the Skechers Friendship Walk and AAU Volleyball League matches - which would require the City to make an exception to its policy limiting the number of major events per day. The following weekend, October 24 & 25, may provide a more balanced operational fit given the existing schedule of the IBVL Tournament and Beach Tennis Matches. Thank you for your consideration. Michelle Crispin President & CEO Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce & Visitors Bureau

Laura Pena

Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Staff - I would like to share several considerations regarding the proposed Nike After Dark Tour LA 2026. Based on the materials provided, the event is anticipated to bring approximately 12,000 runners and up to 1,000 spectators through our City on a Saturday evening in October. While the event could provide regional visibility and activity, the race starts and finishes in Redondo Beach, meaning our City would primarily serve as a pass through segment of the course. Even as a pass through city, our residents and businesses will still experience the operational impacts associated with the event, including traffic circulation changes, parking constraints, and street closures during peak afternoon and evening business hours. Because of these impacts, it is important that if the event is approved, our local businesses and residents see clear and meaningful benefits in return. There is also an important scheduling consideration. The currently proposed weekend of October 17–18 already includes the Skechers Friendship Walk and AAU Volleyball League Matches, and approval of the Nike race that same weekend would require an exception to the City’s policy limiting the number of large events on a given day. By comparison, the following weekend, October 24–25, may work better for our City, given the IBVL Tournament and Beach Tennis Matches, which are generally more beach based and may create fewer overlapping impacts on parking, traffic, and business access. Our City has hosted major events in the past, including the Teen Choice Awards, which brought national exposure but also showed the importance of integrating local businesses early in the planning process. When business participation is not built in from the outset, the economic benefits can be uneven while the disruption remains very real for residents, restaurants, retailers, and service businesses. That lesson is especially relevant here. Nike’s own 2025 After Dark Los Angeles event was clearly designed as more than just a race. Nike described it as a race weekend that included a post-race concert, “music, style and connections,” and broader activations around the event. Nike also promoted a larger training and community model that included training plans, local run club meetups, community events, and post-race recovery zones. At the same time, public reporting on the 2025 Los Angeles event showed that participants experienced long waits and logistical issues, even though many still found the race atmosphere empowering and memorable. That suggests two clear takeaways for our City: First, if Nike is going to bring a major branded event through our city, Hermosa should benefit from the same kinds of activations and community building opportunities Nike promoted elsewhere, not simply absorb closures and disruption while the main start, finish, and highest value activity centers remain in Redondo Beach. Second, the City should ensure strong local planning, communication, and follow through so our residents and businesses are not left dealing with avoidable access, circulation, or event management problems. Our City should benefit through: • A guaranteed spectator and activation zone at Pier Plaza during the race, so the city has a clear gathering place that supports local foot traffic. • Daytime activation of Pier Plaza with booths, sponsor programming, community tables, and promotional partnerships so residents and businesses benefit throughout the day, not just during the run. • Structured opportunities for Hermosa businesses to participate through cheer zones, local promotions, vendor opportunities, and marketing tie-ins. • Expanded VIP and participant hotel room blocks across Hermosa hotels, rather than limiting that benefit to only one or two rooms. • A post event economic impact assessment that includes business feedback, actual visitor spending patterns, and lessons learned for future event approvals. If approved, this event should not simply pass through our City. It should provide meaningful value to the people and businesses who will be most directly affected by it. Thank you for your time and consideration. I appreciate the City’s efforts to bring high quality events to our City, and I hope these suggestions help ensure that any event approved is structured to support both our local economy and our community experience. Laura Pena

Continued from meeting of February 24, 2026
(Lead Special Events and Filming Coordinator Kalyn Kaemerle)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council hold a public hearing to consider and provide direction regarding the following options:

  1. Approve the inclusion of the After Dark Tour LA 2026 on the 2026 Special Events Calendar on Saturday, October 17 to Sunday, October 18;
  2. Approve the inclusion of the After Dark Tour LA 2026 on the 2026 Special Events Calendar on Saturday, October 24 to Sunday, October 25;
  3. Deny the inclusion of the After Dark Tour LA 2026 on the 2026 Special Events Calendar, regardless of dates; or
  4. Approve the inclusion of the After Dark Tour LA 2026 on the 2026 Special Events Calendar contingent on additional negotiations or event elements, as directed by City Council, between staff and Nike, the event producer.

16.b

INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND HBMC SECTION 3.32 TITLED TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX - 26-CMO-009

(Senior Management Analyst Ken Bales)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council introduce by title only and waive first reading of an ordinance updating the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code 3.32.020 Definitions, 3.32.030 Tax Imposed; and 3.32.100 Appeal (Attachment 5).

16.c

INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 17.21 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS - 26-CDD-025

CEQA: Determine the action to be Statutorily Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Public Resources Code § 21080.17.
(Community Development Director Alison Becker)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Determine the action to be Statutorily Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Public Resources Code § 21080.17;
  2. Conduct a public hearing to consider repealing and replacing Chapter 17.21 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code relating to Accessory (ADU) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADU); and
  3. Introduce by title only and waive first reading of an ordinance (Attachment 1) approving Zone Text Amendment (TA 26-01) repealing and replacing Chapter 17.21 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code.

17.

MUNICIPAL MATTERS

17.a

ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT TO JOIN THE SOUTH BAY REGIONAL HOUSING TRUST - 26-CDD-028

CEQA: Determine the action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.
(Community Development Director Alison Becker)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Determine the action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines;
  2. Adopt a resolution (Attachment 1) approving and authorizing the execution of the Joint Powers Authority Agreement joining the South Bay Regional Housing Trust (SBRHT);
  3. Authorize the Mayor to execute the SBRHT Joint Powers Authority Agreement (JPA) (Attachment 2); and
  4. Appoint a City Council member to represent the City on the South Bay Regional Housing Trust Board.

17.b

ADJUSTMENT OF FEES FOR COMMERCIAL ENCROACHMENT AREAS - 26-CMO-012

Courtney Ryan

Dear City Staff & Council, Thank you for reviewing this topic. The ambiance created by retailers and restaurants in Hermosa is often commented on by tourists visiting the area. They LOVE our little beach town. Please consider the win/win that the encroachments create. More sales=more tax revenue.

Michelle Crispin

Dear Mayor, City Staff and Members of the City Council, We appreciate the City’s efforts over the past several years to support outdoor dining and commercial encroachments. These spaces have helped activate our streets, create a more engaging pedestrian experience, and support local businesses. We also appreciate the City revisiting the fee structure and considering adjustments for different types of businesses. However, we are hearing from many retailers that encroachment fees remain challenging. Many of these businesses use relatively small areas for modest product displays or a couple of tables -spaces that are less about expanding revenue and more about visibility and creating an inviting street presence. In today’s retail environment, small independent businesses are navigating significant economic pressures. For many retailers, these outdoor spaces are not primarily revenue generators, but an important way to attract foot traffic and contribute to the character of our commercial districts. While a fee structure around $1.00 per square foot has been discussed, we are hearing from some retailers that even that level can still be challenging depending on the size of the encroachment area and the nature of their business. When businesses are able to activate their storefronts, it makes our commercial corridors more welcoming and walkable. These small outdoor spaces encourage people to spend more time in our business districts and support local economic activity. Most importantly, the small retailers, surf shops, neighborhood markets, and family-run establishments that use these spaces are part of what makes Hermosa truly Hermosa. The Chamber respectfully encourages the City Council to consider a fee structure that supports these businesses while continuing to foster active and welcoming commercial streets. Thank you for your consideration.

Todd Tullis

Encroachment fees should balance the community & retailer benefits of livening up public spaces while also acknowledging the retailer value of using that public space. In this context, I envision 4 categories, from most to least valuable: 1) Pier Plaza - most valuable space with highest foot traffic 2) Parking/On Street space - big spaces otherwise available for parking 3) Sidewalk space - tables, chairs, & other merchandise displays that don't fully block the sidewalk for pedestrians 4) Other spaces - nooks & crannies out of the way of pedestrians & cars, e.g Mickey's patio Accordingly, the merchant costs for each category should be lower for less valuable categories. Modulating the costs based on whether the merchant serves alcohol or not, or on the closing time of the encroachment, or both. By my own calculations/estimates, the following fee levels would result in similar revenue to today while also reducing overall cost for some of the smallest businesses: Pier Plaza = $5 if serve alcohol / $3 no alcohol service On-street = $4 / $2 Sidewalk = $2 / $1 Other = $2 / $1

tony. edit if earlier oubluc comment

edit of previous public comment ------ Desr City Council, i hope you consider the attached when setting patio encroachment fees for small businesses like Micky's and the Green store that serve a vital need to local rssidents and dont get the benefit of city funded foor traffic. Tthat are not restaurants! Per my earlier text i sent you a copy of my Feb 4th Per my earlier text i sent you a copy of my Feb 4th email to Krauss & the city council that may support your arguments for reducing the fee to $1 per sq foot. Hopefully you can make it to the 3/10 ccm to lobby. t. ------ Dear City Council, Dear Doug Krauss' i was surprised that the 2/3 CCM patio encroachment staff report (URL below) seemed to be biased towards costs to the city in terms of lost revenue and NOT cost to the impacted businesses, namely Mickey's and the Green Store. So let me provide the info the staff report failed to provide the options. GREEN STORE ANNUAL COST (312 sqft): @ $2.50 sqft = $9,360 (today) @ $2.00 sqft = $7,488 @ $1.50 sqft = $5,615 @ $1.00 sqft = $3,744 MICKEY's ANNUAL COST (384 sqft): @ $2.50sqft = $11,520 (today) @ $2.00 sqft = $9,217 @ $1.50 sqft = $6,912 @ $1.00 sqft = $4,608 Here is the thing that bugs me. I understand why the staff report provides fiscal impact in terms of list city revenue but i dont understand why the staff report would not provide the above costs to inform the Council's decisions. And i certainly don't understand why the staff report, intentionally or not, did not provide the data above but rather provided the encroachment fee for a PARKING SPACE instead; when neither store takes up a parking space nor are their patios a candidates for parking spaces. This just obfuscated the high cost that Mickey's and the Green Store are actually paying. Hopefully the staff report can be improved before the next hearing. It seems as if the city staff is trying to the scale by omitting this data. Thank you for considering tonyhiggins 2/3 CCM STAFF REPORT https://pub-hermosabeach.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=54055 your arguments for reducing the fee to $1 per sq foot. Hopefully you can make it to the 3/10 ccm to lobby. t. ------ Dear City Council, Dear Doug Krauss' i was surprised that the 2/3 CCM patio encroachment staff report (URL below) seemed to be biased towards costs to the city in terms of lost revenue and NOT cost to the impacted businesses, namely Mickey's and the Green Store. So let me provide the info the staff report failed to provide the options. GREEN STORE ANNUAL COST (312 sqft): @ $2.50 sqft = $9,360 (today) @ $2.00 sqft = $7,488 @ $1.50 sqft = $5,615 @ $1.00 sqft = $3,744 MICKEY's ANNUAL COST (384 sqft): @ $2.50sqft = $11,520 (today) @ $2.00 sqft = $9,217 @ $1.50 sqft = $6,912 @ $1.00 sqft = $4,608 Here is the thing that bugs me. I understand why the staff report provides fiscal impact but i dont understand why the staff report would not provide the above costs to inform the Council's decisions. And i certainly don't understand why the staff report, intentionally or not, did not provide the data above but rather provided the encroachment fee for a PARKING SPACE instead; when neither store takes up a parking space nor are their patios a candidates for parking spaces. This just obfuscated the high cost that Mickey's and the Green Store are actually paying. Hopefully the staff report can be improved before the next hearing. Thank you for considering tonyhiggins 2/3 CCM STAFF REPORT https://pub-hermosabeach.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=54055

tonyhiggins

Desr City Council, i hope you consider the attached when setting patio encroachment fees bit small businesses like Micky's and the Green store that serve a vital need to local rssidents and dont get the benefit of city funded foor traffic. Tthat are not restaurants! Per my earlier text i sent you a copy of my Feb 4th Per my earlier text i sent you a copy of my Feb 4th email to Krauss & the city council that may support your arguments for reducing the fee to $1 per sq foot. Hopefully you can make it to the 3/10 ccm to lobby. t. ------ Dear City Council, Dear Doug Krauss' i was surprised that the 2/3 CCM patio encroachment staff report (URL below) seemed to be biased towards costs to the city in terms of lost revenue and NOT cost to the impacted businesses, namely Mickey's and the Green Store. So let me provide the info the staff report failed to provide the options. GREEN STORE ANNUAL COST (312 sqft): @ $2.50 sqft = $9,360 (today) @ $2.00 sqft = $7,488 @ $1.50 sqft = $5,615 @ $1.00 sqft = $3,744 MICKEY's ANNUAL COST (384 sqft): @ $2.50sqft = $11,520 (today) @ $2.00 sqft = $9,217 @ $1.50 sqft = $6,912 @ $1.00 sqft = $4,608 Here is the thing that bugs me. I understand why the staff report provides fiscal impact in terms of list city revenue but i dont understand why the staff report would not provide the above costs to inform the Council's decisions. And i certainly don't understand why the staff report, intentionally or not, did not provide the data above but rather provided the encroachment fee for a PARKING SPACE instead; when neither store takes up a parking space nor are their patios a candidates for parking spaces. This just obfuscated the high cost that Mickey's and the Green Store are actually paying. Hopefully the staff report can be improved before the next hearing. It seems as if the city staff is trying to the scale by omitting this data. Thank you for considering tonyhiggins 2/3 CCM STAFF REPORT https://pub-hermosabeach.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=54055 your arguments for reducing the fee to $1 per sq foot. Hopefully you can make it to the 3/10 ccm to lobby. t. ------ Dear City Council, Dear Doug Krauss' i was surprised that the 2/3 CCM patio encroachment staff report (URL below) seemed to be biased towards costs to the city in terms of lost revenue and NOT cost to the impacted businesses, namely Mickey's and the Green Store. So let me provide the info the staff report failed to provide the options. GREEN STORE ANNUAL COST (312 sqft): @ $2.50 sqft = $9,360 (today) @ $2.00 sqft = $7,488 @ $1.50 sqft = $5,615 @ $1.00 sqft = $3,744 MICKEY's ANNUAL COST (384 sqft): @ $2.50sqft = $11,520 (today) @ $2.00 sqft = $9,217 @ $1.50 sqft = $6,912 @ $1.00 sqft = $4,608 Here is the thing that bugs me. I understand why the staff report provides fiscal impact but i dont understand why the staff report would not provide the above costs to inform the Council's decisions. And i certainly don't understand why the staff report, intentionally or not, did not provide the data above but rather provided the encroachment fee for a PARKING SPACE instead; when neither store takes up a parking space nor are their patios a candidates for parking spaces. This just obfuscated the high cost that Mickey's and the Green Store are actually paying. Hopefully the staff report can be improved before the next hearing. Thank you for considering tonyhiggins 2/3 CCM STAFF REPORT https://pub-hermosabeach.escribemeetings.com/filestream.ashx?DocumentId=54055

(Environmental Programs Manager Douglas Krauss)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council consider adjusting certain commercial encroachment fees.

18.

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

This is the time for Councilmembers to schedule future agenda items and to ask questions about the status of previously approved future agenda items. No discussion, debate, or public comment will be taken. Councilmembers should consider the city's work plan when considering new items. The tentative future agenda items document is provided for information only. 

18.a

TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS - 26-CMO-013

Attached is the current list of tentative future agenda items for Council’s information.

19.

CITY MANAGER REPORT

20.

INFORMATIONAL ITEMS

This is reserved for items that do not require City Council action. The City Council may request a future agenda item to discuss an informational item. Otherwise, discussion of informational items will not be taken. 

20.a

POLICE CRIME STATISTICS FOR JANUARY 2026

(Police Chief Landon Phillips)

20.b

ACTION MINUTES OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 10, 2026

(Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols)

20.c

PARKING CITATION AND METERED REVENUE REPORT—FEBRUARY 2026

(Senior Management Analyst Ken Bales)

21.

ADJOURNMENT