CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting Agenda

Tuesday, March 24, 2026

Closed Session at 5:00 PM and Open Session at 6:00 PM

Council Chambers

1315 Valley Drive

Hermosa Beach, CA 90254

CITY COUNCIL
Mike Detoy, Mayor  
Michael D. Keegan, Mayor Pro Tem
Ray Jackson, Councilmember 
Dean Francois, Councilmember
Rob Saemann, Councilmember

David Pedersen, City Treasurer

APPOINTED OFFICIALS
Steve Napolitano, City Manager
Jason Baltimore, Interim City Attorney 

EXECUTIVE TEAM
Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director
Ann Yang, Interim City Clerk
Alison Becker, Community Development Director
Lisa Nichols, Parks and Recreation Director
Landon Phillips, Police Chief 
Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990 - To comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Assistive Listening Devices (ALD) are available for check out at the meeting. If you require special assistance to participate in this meeting, you must call or submit your request in writing to the Office of the City Clerk at [phone] or at at least 48 hours before the meeting. 

 

PARTICIPATION AND VIEWING OPTIONS  

Hermosa Beach City Council meetings are open to the public and are being held in person in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. Public comment is only guaranteed to be taken in person at City Hall during the meeting or prior to the meeting by submitting an eComment for an item on the agenda. As a courtesy only, the public may view and participate via the following: 

 

• Zoom: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89968207828? pwd=bXZmWS83dmxHWDZLbWRTK2RVaUxaUT092
• Phone: Toll Free: [phone]; Meeting ID: 899 6820 7828, then #; Passcode: 472825
• eComment:  On the HTML agenda, click an agenda item, then click on the blue “Leave comment” (on computer) / blue speech bubble (on phone/tablet) button to provide a comment for that item. Submit eComments no later than three (3) hours before the meeting start time.
• Supplemental Email: Submit a supplemental email for agenda items only to [email protected]. Supplemental emails should indicate the agenda item and meeting date in the subject line and must be received no later than three (3) hours before the meeting start time. Emails received after the deadline but before the meeting ends will be posted to the agenda the next business day. Writings distributed to all, or majority of all, of the City Council after the agenda has been posted shall be available for inspection at the City Clerk's Office located at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 during regular business hours.

Please be advised that while the City will endeavor to ensure these remote participation methods are available, the City does not guarantee that they will be technically feasible or work all the time. Further, the City reserves the right to terminate these remote participation methods (subject to Brown Act restrictions) at any time and for whatever reason. Please attend in person or by submitting an eComment to ensure your public participation.  

 

Similarly, as a courtesy, the City will also plan to broadcast the meeting via the following listed mediums. However, these are done as a courtesy only and not guaranteed to be technically feasible. Thus, in order to guarantee live time viewing and/or public participation, members of the public shall attend in Council Chambers. 

 

• Cable TV: Spectrum Channel 8 and Frontier Channel 31 in Hermosa Beach 
• YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/CityofHermosaBeach90254 
• Live Stream: www.hermosabeach.gov/agenda
• Cablecast App: Available on supported devices and smart TVs

If you experience technical difficulties while viewing a meeting on any of our digital platforms, please try another viewing option. 

---

1.

CLOSED SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 5:00 PM

2.

ROLL CALL

3.

PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSED SESSION AGENDA

This Public Comment period is limited to Closed Session agenda items only. Public Comment is limited to three (3) minutes per speaker.

4.

RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION

4.a

MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session held on March 10, 2026

4.b

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR

California Government Code section 54957.6
City Negotiator: Tyler Cashman, Interim Human Resources Manager
Organizations: Teamsters, Professional and Medical Employees’ Union, Local 986

4.c

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: EXISTING LITIGATION

California Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1)
Name of Case: Koerner v. City of Hermosa Beach
Case Number: 25STCP00891

5.

OPEN SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM

6.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

7.

ROLL CALL

8.

CLOSED SESSION REPORT

9.

ANNOUNCEMENTS—UPCOMING CITY EVENTS

10.

APPROVAL OF AGENDA

This is the time for the City Council to discuss any changes to the order of agenda items.

• Recommended Action:

  To approve the order of the agenda.

11.

PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS

11.a

RECOGNIZING RESIDENT AND UFC WELTERWEIGHT CONTENDER, JEAN-PAUL LEBOSNOYANI

12.

PUBLIC COMMENT

mc guerry

Looks like Robert Aronoff is pulling from Trump's playback by blaming the failures of the current City Manager and council on the previous City Manager. None of his points make sense, but I am sure he will try to blame her for everything that goes wrong for years to come.

Robert Aronoff

The review of the budget later this evening shows the wisdom of getting rid of Suja Lowenthal as the City Manager. It is apparent that the shortfall has been caused by her: • Having unnecessary expenses in the city manager’s office, • Hiring an assistant city manager, • Having unreasonably delayed the completion of the Clark Building renovation, and • Hiring a search firm to replace her.

tonyhiggins

Dear City Council, PLAN Hermosa prioritizes street safety and traffic calming to moderate vehicle speeds. However, despite these goals, a recent HBPD report reveals that the city hasn’t issued a single speeding ticket on busy residential collector roads like Prospect, Ardmore, Gould, 27th Street, or Manhattan Avenue in over two years. While the City Council quickly reduced speed limits to 20 mph on Pier and Hermosa Avenues downtown, they refuse to publicly consider similar reductions for these RESIDENTIAL streets—even those that clearly qualify. Incumbents Jackson, Saemann, and Francois, all up for re-election this November, owe the public an explanation for this inconsistency. If they won't prioritize the safety of our residential neighborhoods, it’s time to elect leaders who will.

tonyhiggins

Dear Council, Something you may not have known: California's use of the 85th percentile rule has historically led to a phenomenon known as "speed creep," where speed limits gradually increase over time. Under the traditional application of this rule, local governments were often forced to raise speed limits to match the speed at which 85% of drivers were already traveling to maintain legal enforcement. This created a cycle: as the posted limit rose, drivers often drove even faster, leading to a higher 85th percentile in the next mandatory 7- to 14-year survey, which then required another limit. You can do something about that [preemptively] by reducing the speed limit from 25 to 20mph on busy RESIDENTIAL collector roads like prospect, 27th and Gould adjacent to Valley Park where legitimate safety concerns meet the tests required by AB 43. Thank you for your consideration, tonyhiggins

This is the time for members of the public to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction and on items where public comment will not be taken (City Manager Reports, City Councilmember Comments, Consent Calendar items not pulled for separate discussion, and Future Agenda Items). If public comment is provided on a Public Hearing or Municipal Matter item, public comment on the same item will not be accepted when the item is heard at a later part of the meeting.

The public is invited to attend and provide public comment. Public comments are limited to three minutes per speaker from those present in City Council Chambers and via the remote participation options listed on the agenda. This time allotment may be modified due to time constraints at the discretion of the Mayor or City Council. 

No action will be taken on matters raised during public comment, except that the Council may take action to schedule issues raised during public comment for a future agenda. Speakers with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are encouraged to submit those comments directly to the City Manager. Members of the public will have a future opportunity to speak on items pulled from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion, Public Hearings, and Municipal Matters when those items are heard.

13.

CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS

14.

UPDATES ON CITY COUNCIL ACTIVITIES

This is the time for members of the City Council to report on their attendance at ad hoc subcommittees or standing committee meetings, conferences, or other official activities as City representatives. 

15.

CONSENT CALENDAR

The following matters will be acted upon collectively with a single motion and vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. Councilmembers may orally register a negative vote on any Consent Calendar item without pulling the item for separate consideration before the vote on the Consent Calendar. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember removes an item from the Consent Calendar, either under Approval of the Agenda or under this item before the vote on the Consent Calendar. Items removed for separate discussion will be provided a separate public comment period.

• Recommended Action:

  To approve the consent calendar.

15.a

WAIVE READING IN FULL OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ON THE AGENDA

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council waive reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions on the agenda and declare that said titles which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

15.b

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES

(Interim City Clerk Ann Yang)

• Recommended Action:

  To approve the minutes of the March 10, 2026 regular meeting.

15.c

CHECK REGISTERS - 26-AS-021

(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council receive and file the check registers for March 4, 2026 (Attachment 1) through March 11, 2026 (Attachment 2). The Administrative Services Director certifies the accuracy of the demands.

15.d

CITY TREASURER’S REPORT - 26-AS-022

(City Treasurer Dave Pedersen)

• Recommended Action:

  The City Treasurer recommends City Council receive and file the February 2026 City Treasurer’s Report.

15.e

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT AS OF MARCH 12, 2026 - 26-PW-015

mc guerry

I urge you to work on getting CIP 143 moving again. PCH is a dangerous street for everyone who uses it and needs the improvement in mobility, accessibility, and safety that this project will bring.

(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council receive and file the Capital Improvement Program Status Report as of March 12, 2026.

15.f

APPROVE SPECIAL EVENT LONG-TERM AGREEMENT WITH HOPE CHAPEL FROM 2026 THROUGH 2028 TO PROVIDE ANNUAL HOPE CHAPEL PICNIC EVENTS - 26-PR-002

(Special Events and Filming Coordinator Austin DeWeese)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Approve a special event long-term agreement (LTA) with Hope Chapel from 2026 through 2028 to provide annual Hope Chapel picnic events (Attachment); and
  2. Authorize the City Manager to execute and the City Clerk to attest the LTA, subject to approval by the City Attorney.

15.g

APPROVE REMOVAL OF THREE OF SIX BASKETBALL HOOPS ON WEST SIDE OF CLARK FIELD - 26-PR-009

(Parks and Recreation Director Lisa Nichols)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council approve the removal of three of six basketball hoops along the western side of Clark Field, and the associated safety improvement measures.

15.h

RATIFY LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR REFORMING MENTAL HEALTHCARE WITHIN THE COUNTY’S HOMELESSNESS SERVICES SYSTEM MOTION - 26-CMO-016

(Senior Management Analyst Sara Russo)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council ratify a letter of support sent on March 16, 2026 supporting Los Angeles County Supervisors Lindsey P. Horvath and Kathryn Barger’s motion, Reforming Mental Healthcare Within the County’s Homelessness Services System, at the March 17, 2026 Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Meeting.

15.i

ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AMENDING HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 3.32 TITLED TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX - 26-CMO-015

(Senior Management Analyst Ken Bales)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Waive full second reading and adopt by title only “An Ordinance amending Hermosa Beach Municipal Code Section 3.32.020 Definitions, 3.32.030 Tax Imposed, and 3.32.100 Appeal (Attachment); and
  2. Direct the City Clerk to print and publish a summary ordinance in a newspaper of general circulation within 15 days following adoption and post a copy on the City’s bulletin for 30 days.

15.j

ADOPT AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 17.21 OF THE HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS AND JUNIOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS - 26-CDD-036

CEQA: Determine the action to be Statutorily Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Public Resources Code § 21080.17.
(Community Development Director Alison Becker)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Determine the Ordinance to be Statutorily Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Public Resources Code § 21080.17;
  2. Adopt by title only and waive second reading of an Ordinance (Attachment 1) repealing and replacing Chapter 17.21 of the Hermosa Beach Municipal Code pertaining to Accessory (ADU) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADU); and
  3. Direct the City Clerk to print and publish the summary ordinance in a newspaper of general circulation within 15 days following adoption and post it on the City’s bulletin for 30-days.

15.k

APPROVE FOURTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH IK CONSULTING, LLC TO PROVIDE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE WITH THE ACCELA CIVIC PLATFORM SOFTWARE - 26-CDD-037

(Community Development Director Alison Becker)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Approve the proposed fourth amendment to an agreement with IK Consulting, LLC to provide ongoing technical assistance with the Accela Civic platform to increase the not-to-exceed amount by $23,000, resulting in a total not-to-exceed amount of $82,725 (Attachment 1);
  2. Appropriate $23,000 from Records Technology Fees reserved in the Equipment Replacement Fund for the fourth amendment; and
  3. Authorize the City Manager to execute and the City Clerk to attest the attached fourth amendment (or similar in substance), subject to modification and approval by the City Attorney

15.l

CITY COUNCIL DOWNTOWN LIGHTING AND BEAUTIFICATION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT ON EXPENDITURE PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025–2026 BEAUTIFICATION FUNDING - 26-PW-013

Adam Malovani

Please consider removing this item from this meeting’s consent calendar and moving to a later date. I believe there are downtown business owners and The Chamber who would like more time to coordinate and provide feedback on these projects or others they may prefer for the same budget. Continuation to a future agenda would allow them this coordination time.

Jeff Raedy

Please consider removing this item from this meeting’s consent calendar and moving to a later date. I have no issue with the particular beautification projects, per se, but I believe there are downtown business owners who would like more time to coordinate and provide feedback on these projects or others they may prefer for the same budget. Continuation to a future agenda would allow them this coordination time.

Nancy Schwappach

Hello again. This is a supplement to my first e-comment, as to which it has been suggested I buried the lede. So, I request Council pull this item from the consent calendar and continue discussion to a future meeting. If Council pulls this item and elects to discuss and decide at this meeting, I request $500 plus whatever in the "brick replacement" line item is attributable to the vintage signs, be spent on the vintage sign repair. I request the balance of the $100,000 designated in the Capital Improvement budget for downtown lighting, wayfinding and beautification, remain in the piggy bank until the community has the opportunity to determine how best to spend those funds for those purposes. See my earlier e-comment for a further explanation. Thank you for your consideration of these remarks and your service to our city.

Nancy Schwappach

Hello. I also request this item be removed from the consent calendar and continued to another date. If Council chooses not to continue it to another date, please consider the following: 1. This subcommittee was established at the 5/13/25 Council meeting as a Downtown Lighting and Beautification subcommittee, yet none of the proposed projects are in the downtown area. 2. I read the 1/8/26 staff memo (attached) which described challenges related to proposed downtown projects - string lights, hanging planters, enhanced landscaping - so that may explain why the subcommittee changed scope. 3. However, the subcommittee having changed scope, and proposing enhancing a few planters scattered throughout the City seems fundamentally different than the original mission. 4. I fully support undertaking necessary maintenance, repairs and improvements to the vintage signs. I was not clear on the "brick repairs" but, subject to that, it seems $500 is allocated to vintage sign repair. That seems a maintenance item but if there is insufficient budget for this, perhaps $500 (plus any portion of the brick repair item) of the $100,000 allocated to "beautification" in the Capital Improvement Budget could go toward that. 5. I suggest landscape and planter enhancements, which are sorely needed, become their own item like streets, sidewalks, etc. This would allow time for a more thorough review of priorities (safety) and scope. Thank you for your consideration.

Michelle Crispin

Dear Mayor, Council, and Staff - On behalf of the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors, we want to begin by expressing our appreciation for the City Council’s decision to set aside $100,000 for beautification activities intended to improve the downtown commercial district. We recognize and value the City’s willingness to invest in the public realm and in the appearance of our commercial areas. The Chamber shares the goal of creating a more attractive, welcoming, and economically vibrant downtown. We also appreciate that beautification is recognized in the City’s Economic Development Strategy as an important part of strengthening our commercial districts and overall quality of place. At the same time, that same strategy emphasizes that implementation should occur in collaboration with the Chamber of Commerce and with input from the community as part of our beautification efforts. Accordingly, the Chamber respectfully requests that the City Council defer final approval of the expenditure plan to a future meeting date and allow time for broader Chamber led outreach to downtown businesses and stakeholders. A continuation would allow the Chamber to gather practical feedback from businesses and provide the Council with more informed input on which improvements would be most visible, most valued, and most supportive of economic activity. We also respectfully request that the City provide the relevant materials used to develop this recommendation, including memoranda, action minutes, meeting summaries, and other background documents, so the Chamber can provide informed feedback. Thank you for your consideration and for your continued support of Hermosa Beach’s commercial districts. Sincerely, Michelle Crispin

Randy Balik

Just a suggestion to continue this item to a future date. I know that downtown lighting and beautification is an important topic and has been for quite a while (and I generally support it!). But in speaking with some local business owners, who are really at the tip of the pyramid of those who will benefit, I've heard multiple folks suggest that this item its current form needs a bit more time for review. Seems to me it wouldn't hurt to continue this one for a bit and seek more thorough input, and that thorough input can only be developed with a bit more review time and discussion.

Laura Pena

Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Staff - I am writing to respectfully request a continuance of this item regarding the Downtown Lighting and Beautification Subcommittee’s recommendation for the $100,000 beautification funding allocation. Beautification is important, and I appreciate the effort that has gone into developing a proposal. However, before the City takes final action, I believe there should be an opportunity for broader feedback from residents, downtown businesses, and property owners. These funds were intended to support the downtown commercial district, and additional outreach would help ensure the expenditure plan reflects community priorities and the City’s broader economic development goals. I also believe the City should consider whether some or all of these funds could support a partnership in which businesses work with the Chamber of Commerce to explore collaborating with the City on a string lighting palm trees and/or hanging flower basket project. Improvements like these could help create a stronger sense of place, beautify the downtown, and support a more welcoming and vibrant business district. A continuance would not stop the work. It would simply provide time for a more transparent and inclusive review of the recommendations and allow stakeholders to weigh in on whether the current proposal is the best use of these funds. For these reasons, I respectfully ask the City Council to continue this item to a future meeting and invite additional public and business feedback before approving the expenditure plan. As always, I appreciate your consideration. Laura Pena

CEQA: Determine the action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines.
(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente and Community Development Director Alison Becker)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Determine the proposed improvements are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301;
  2. Adopt the Expenditure Plan prepared by the City Council Downtown Lighting and Beautification Subcommittee; and
  3. Authorize staff to undertake projects identified in the Expenditure Plan.

16.

PUBLIC HEARINGS—TO COMMENCE AT 6:30 P.M

17.

MUNICIPAL MATTERS

17.a

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (CIP) 623 REGARDING MUNICIPAL PIER STRUCTURAL INSPECTION AND EVALUATION, REPAIR, AND REQUEST FOR DIRECTION REGARDING POSSIBLE REPLACEMENT

tonyhiggins

Total Costs by 2070 Replace Strategy: ~$105 million (Cumulative). Repair Strategy: ~$210 million (Cumulative). Breakeven Year: Approximately 2053. I guess the only question is does Hermosa need a $105 million pier at all? That's way above my pay grade. Note: it might cost $10-20 million to tear down the pier

Tom Horton

On behalf of The South Bay Boardrider's Club, a 501c3 non-profit founded in 2009 by 4 Hermosa Beach locals, please postpone the relocation of the plaques until a more suitable location is identified, and we request that staff include Surfer Walk of Fame inductees in the decision making process for a new location. We are not aware of any who find the railing an acceptable new location for these plaques honoring our local legends. Thank you for your consideration.

CEQA: Determine that the high priority structural repairs and removal and replacement of the Surfer’s Walk of Fame Plaques Project (“Project”) as part of CIP 623 is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15301.
(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Determine that the high priority structural repairs and, removal, and replacement of the Surfer’s Walk of Fame Plaques Project (“Project”) as part of CIP 623 is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities);
  2. Direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption within 5 business days;
  3. Direct staff to complete the high priority repairs to the Municipal Pier (“Pier”) as part of CIP Project 623;
  4. Direct staff to replace the Surfer’s Walk of Fame plaques with the railing-mounted option as part of CIP 623; and
  5. Provide staff with direction on whether to begin the planning and environmental review process for a proposed replacement project.

17.b

MIDYEAR BUDGET REVIEW 2025-26 - 26-AS-023

Laura Pena

Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Staff - I appreciate the effort to address current needs, but I remain concerned that the City is continuing to rely on one time funds to balance a budget that staff describes as facing ongoing structural deficits. I respectfully ask Council to focus on the longer term picture before approving the full package as presented. The five year forecast shows expenditures rising well above revenues by FY 2030–31. What is the specific plan to close that gap in a sustainable way, rather than continuing to rely on one-time solutions? Relatedly, before the estimated remaining unspent FY 2024–25 funds are assigned, I would appreciate clarity on what legal or policy constraints apply to those dollars and whether any portion can be leveraged in a way that permanently reduces the City’s structural deficit, rather than simply backfilling another year. QUESTIONS: 1. I also have questions about the proposed increase to Community Development contract services. If the goal is to improve plan review capacity, permit processing, and state reporting, how will success be measured? What are the current turnaround times, what improvement is expected, and when will Council and the public see performance data showing whether this added spending is actually producing faster and more reliable service? I also encourage Council to consider an expedited review pathway, where legally appropriate, for revenue generating projects and permits that can strengthen the tax base, support local business activity, and improve investment confidence. In a period of structural deficits, the City should be looking not only at cost control, but also at how to responsibly accelerate projects that produce ongoing economic value and public revenue. 2. On Beach Cities Transit Line 109, the report notes that our City amended the agreement to require enhanced ridership reporting, yet the data received so far is still too incomplete for meaningful analysis. Before additional funding decisions are made, what leverage does the City have under the agreement to require complete and usable ridership data? If these funds are meant to serve our residents, the public and Council should have enough information to make informed decisions based on actual usage and benefit. 3. I also support replacing aging vehicles when necessary, but I am not yet convinced by the request for an additional $106,600 to purchase and outfit two Ford Explorers for Police Administration staff. Since these are administrative vehicles replacing two older hybrid sedans, I would like staff to explain why Explorer sized vehicles are the most appropriate and cost effective choice since the LA County’s own law enforcement master rate sheet distinguishes a Ford Escape as “white fleet” and a Ford Explorer as “Street Package – Executive?” Finally, I recommend that the Finance Subcommittee hold public hearings going forward on major budget and forecast issues so residents have a meaningful opportunity to ask questions and provide thoughtful feedback before recommendations reach Council. Given the report’s own warning of fiscal uncertainty and structural deficits driven by expenditures outpacing anticipated revenues, a more open and participatory process would help build trust and improve decision making. As always, I appreciate your thoughtful consideration. Laura Pena

Robert Aronoff

Please make public and examine what litigation is causing you to increase the budget by $200,000 ( almost 50%) for the City Attorney. Hermosa's legal costs for both attorneys and payments on legal cases is higher than in the other beach cities. This is the time to examine this more closely and not just pass over it as consent item.

Alex Fineman

I urge the City to continue funding BCT 109. As a former Hermosa Beach resident and current Redondo Beach resident, I've been using BCT for over a decade and lately, using BCT 109 as a means to visit downtown Hermosa Beach without having to worry about parking. For a City that struggles with meeting its parking demand, BCT should be seen as part of the solution to the problem, not a minor line item to be deleted. Furthermore, BCT 109 now provides a one-seat ride from Hermosa Beach to the new LAX people mover, and should be promoted to its residents as an easy, affordable way to reach the airport. The City should take the opportunity to invest in BCT and improve its service, not defund it.

Tyron Gunn

On behalf of Beach Cities Transit, our agency values its partnership with the City of Hermosa Beach. The services we provide are designed to support mobility, reduce congestion, and enhance regional connectivity for residents, workers, and visitors. We are proud to serve Hermosa Beach with Line 109 and our Dial-a-Ride program and hope to continue this partnership into the future. We understand the City's interest in obtaining city-specific ridership data. Hermosa Beach staff amended our FY 2025-26 agreement to require the reporting of Metro's "Daily A102" report, which details daily Metro TAP card transactions. We were happy to share this report; however, the report is managed by Metro and BCT does not control the completeness of the data. This report also does not capture all riders, only those paying fare via a Metro TAP card. To address this need for stop-level data, we recently asked our bus operators to begin manually counting activity at each bus stop. Between November 1, 2025 and March 10, 2026 approximately 910 riders boarded Line 109 within Hermosa Beach and approximately 1,130 riders disembarked within Hermosa Beach. This new data was made available to Hermosa Beach staff during a meeting on March 19, 2026. Thank you for your consideration, Tyron Gunn – City of Redondo Beach, Transit Manager

mc guerry

I oppose discontinuing funding for the BCT 109. I use it to get to other places in the South Bay. Instead, you should increase funding for it and then increase its frequency. This would be a much better use of funds than more pickleball courts.

(Finance Manager Henry Chao)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Approve the revisions to estimated revenue, appropriations, budget transfers and fund balances as shown herein and in the attached Projected Change in Financial Position (Attachment 1) and the Midyear Budget Amendment (Attachment 2);
  2. Approve the following transactions from the General Fund:
     1. Appropriate $548,007 of assigned fund balance from the Midyear Budget Review 2025-26 to cover the $548,007 unassigned fund balance shortfall;
     2. Transfer $317,833 of unspent funds from 2024-25 actuals to the Insurance Fund to bring the up to the funding goal of $3.0 million;
     3. Assign the estimated remaining $2,239,276 of unspent funds from 2024-25 actuals to the assigned fund balance category;
  3. Receive and file the City Council Travel Summary (Attachment 3); and
  4. Provide direction to staff on whether to continue or discontinue the City’s participation in the Beach Cities Transit (BCT) Line 109 agreement currently funded by Fund 145 Proposition A funds, given increasing subsidy requests, ongoing structural cost pressures, and insufficient ridership data to evaluate Hermosa Beach-specific benefits.

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

17.c

KELLY COURTS – PICKLEBALL COURTS POLICY REVISIONS - 26-PR-015

Mary Young

I am a 36-year resident of Hermosa Beach, and have truly valued the city's emphasis on health, outdoor activity, and sports. I am an avid pickleball player but often have to go to neighboring cities to play due to court shortage or hours. While we are excited about the new courts, the limited hours make it difficult for working people or students to play. I strongly support expanding hours and continuing the reservation system at least in the mornings. Other cities have expanded access and hours, and I trust that Hermosa will embrace this sport that has come to mean so much to so many.

Bobby Oh

I’m a long-time Hermosa Beach resident and live a few houses from Clark Field, so I hear park activity regularly and also understand how noise can impact neighbors. I strongly support expanding hours, and I think Option 2 (9 a.m. – 9 p.m. daily) is the most ideal since the courts are consistently full. That said, I understand why starting with Option 1 makes sense right now. Pickleball brings real health and community benefits, and the City has already invested in these courts—it makes sense to fully use them. In a compact, busy city like Hermosa, some level of sound is part of living near parks—like the regular sounds from little league at Clark Field—while still being respectful of those nearby. The demand is there, the investment is there—it’s time to make the most of these courts for the community.

Monica Beeferman

I am writing to express my support for option 2 (courts open daily from 9am to 9pm). I have been a resident of Hermosa Beach for almost 7 years. I moved here right after college and fell in love with the community, especially the well maintained and accessible public spaces. As someone who works full time, evenings and weekends are the only times I can benefit from the city resources, such as the pickleball courts. Opening the courts from 9am-9pm daily will make them much more accessible to all residents and limit the competition associated with reserving a court currently. I understand that pickleball can be noisy, but so are all of the other activities that take place at a public park. There is no reason this sport should be limited any differently.

Linda Trinh

Dear Council Members, I’m a Hermosa Beach resident and pickleball player of two years. I’m writing to ask if the city would consider expanding court availability to include some evening and weekend hours. Specifically expand evening hours, daily 9am to 9pm would be great. I used to be able to catch a Friday game when my schedule allowed, but honestly, even then it was really hard to get a court — Fridays fill up fast! Now that my work schedule has changed to standard Monday–Friday, 10 a.m. to 6 p.m., getting out there during the day just isn’t an option anymore. I’d love to be able to play a few evenings after work or on the weekends. It’s honestly one of my favorite ways to decompress, get some exercise, and hang out with people in the community. I really appreciate everything the city does for its residents, and I hope this is something the Council can look into. Thanks so much for your time!

Anna Garcia

I’m a 11-year Hermosa Beach resident, a pickleball player, and I live near the courts. I’m writing to strongly support expanding court hours. Option 2 (9 a.m. – 9 p.m. daily) is the most ideal and truly reflects the level of demand. The courts are consistently full. Even living nearby, I’ve only been able to reserve a court twice in the past two years. Residents pay a $20 annual membership, yet Parks and Recreation is upfront with all applicants that reservations are very difficult and not guaranteed. It’s frustrating to be able to walk to the courts, but still have to drive 15–20 minutes to find a place to play. At the same time, I understand the concerns around noise. Living near Clark Field means living with activity—it’s part of a shared community space. The goal should be balance. I also recognize that pickleball courts can be contentious. That’s exactly why it’s important for the City to rely on facts. A professional sound study within 120 days of reopening will help guide future decisions and confirm whether the court renovations and mitigation efforts are working. Thank you for your consideration.

Mary Stevens

I am a Hermosa resident of 15 years and am wriring to support Option 1, to add Sunday hours for pickleball. I understand the importance of being thoughtful to neighbors as well as the strong demand for play. The courts are consistently full and difficult to reserve, leading to locals often choosing out-of-town options at high prices. It is also clear that noise is a real consideration for nearby residents and that while living near a park does not guarantee silence, it should expect reasonable sound mitigation. Option 1 is a balanced starting point, adding Sunday 9am-4pm hours to the current schedule. It increases access while still maintaining reasonable limits for the surrounding neighborhood. Recommended additional for a critical next step - Fund a professional sound study (within several months of reopening) that measures the actual impacts (sound levels, duration, frequency) nearby. And then use this data to evaluate the possibility of exanding to Option 2 (9am-9pm daily). A sound study would support recreation and community wellness while basing future decisions on real data, not assumptions. This demonstrates a thoughtful balance between public access and neighboorhood quality of life. Pickleball is an important part of Hermosa's community life and a phased, evidence-based approach would allow the city to move forward responsibly. Thank you for your consideration!

Amy Huang

I’m a Hermosa Beach resident of 8 years, and I’m writing to express my strong support for expanding access to the Kelly Pickleball Courts. Specifically, I urge you to adopt Option B and extend court hours to 9am–9pm daily. This decision will best meet the needs of our community today. While I appreciate the planned expansion from two to four courts, demand for pickleball locally is high and continues to grow rapidly, Four courts is still not many, and access will remain constrained without expanded hours. Pickleball has become a positive, healthy, and social outlet for all ages, and yet, current availability doesn't come close to meeting demand. Expanding hours is a practical and immediate way to better serve a large and active group of residents while also helping to reduce demand during peak times. While I understand there have been concerns raised by nearby neighbors, it’s important to recognize that these courts are located within a public park, where recreational activity and associated noise are to be expected. At present, the limitations appear to place disproportionate weight on a relatively small number of resident complaints, while restricting access for a much broader segment of the community. Expanding court availability to 9am–9pm will ensures more equitable access and promotes another avenue for healthy activity and social connection in our little beach town. Thank you for your consideration and for supporting a solution that better reflects the needs of the community.

Kimberly Noble

I’m a Hermosa Beach resident of 12 years, and I’m writing to express my strong support for expanding access to the Kelly Pickleball Courts. Specifically, I urge you to adopt Option B and extend court hours to 9am–9pm daily. This decision will best meet the needs of our community today. While I appreciate the planned expansion from two to four courts, demand for pickleball locally is high and continues to grow rapidly, Four courts is still not many, and access will remain constrained without expanded hours. Pickleball has become a positive, healthy, and social outlet for all ages, and yet, current availability doesn't come close to meeting demand. Expanding hours is a practical and immediate way to better serve a large and active group of residents while also helping to reduce demand during peak times. While I understand there have been concerns raised by nearby neighbors, it’s important to recognize that these courts are located within a public park, where recreational activity and associated noise are to be expected. At present, the limitations appear to place disproportionate weight on a relatively small number of resident complaints, while restricting access for a much broader segment of the community. Expanding court availability to 9am–9pm will ensures more equitable access and promotes another avenue for healthy activity and social connection in our little beach town. Thank you for your consideration and for supporting a solution that better reflects the needs of the community.

Yu-Shen Ng

I'm a resident of Hermosa Beach. I live on 11th street, within 1 block of the Kelly Courts. I encourage the Council to open the courts for the maximum time possible: Option 2. Twice a week, I already drive too far (10 to 20 minutes away) to find courts that are already too busy (wait times of 10-15 minutes for every 15 minutes of play). There just aren't enough courts in the area, even with recent additions of new courts in Redondo Beach (at Alta Vista) and upcoming additions in Torrance (at Wilson Park). Please help. I particularly recommend drop-in open play. It's more community-oriented and enables greater utility for all. All 4 courts should allocate significant time for drop-in open play; if only 2 courts are available for drop-in open play, there won't be a critical mass of players. Thanks!

Charlene Penna

Hello City Council, I am a Hermosa Beach resident of 37 years and an avid pickleball player. I mostly play at a private club 30 minutes away, paying for memberships in other cities, because even with the four Kelly Courts after renovation, local access is very limited. Playing locally would allow me to stay active and connect with neighbors in my own community. I understand some neighbors are concerned about noise, and I hope the staff’s recommendation to designate Courts 1 and 2 for reservation and open walk-on play, Courts 3 and 4 for walk-on only, along with Option 2 hours (9 a.m.–9 p.m. daily), can balance everyone’s needs. I also encourage structured programming like leagues and round robins to make the courts welcoming for all residents. Thank you.

(Senior Recreation Supervisor Brian Sousa)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Approve modifications to the Kelly Pickleball Courts Use Policy, including revisions to the permissible play equipment and designating courts 1 and 2 for reservation and open walk-on play, with Courts 3 and 4 open for walk-on play only; and
  2. Approve one of the following options to modify the courts’ hours of operation:
     • Option 1 (Attachment 2):
       • Monday: Closed
       • Tuesday: 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.
       • Wednesday: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
       • Thursday: 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.
       • Friday–Sunday: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
     • Option 2 (Attachment 3):
       • 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. daily; or
     • Option 3 (Attachment 1):
       • The Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission’s (Commission) recommendation to maintain the facility hours as currently designated:
         • Sunday and Monday: Closed
         • Tuesday: 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.
         • Wednesday: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
         • Thursday: 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.
         • Friday: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
         • Saturday: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.; and
       • request for staff to report back to the Commission within 120 days following the reopening of the courts with a report on complaints, community feedback, and court usage.

17.d

APPROVE THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ON-CALL SANITARY SEWER AND VIDEO INSPECTION SERVICES WITH EMPIRE PIPE CLEANING AND EQUIPMENT, INC. - 26-PW-011

(CEQA): The action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5).
(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Determine the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5);
  2. Approve the proposed amendment to the agreement with Empire Pipe Cleaning and Equipment, Inc. to provide sanitary sewer hydro-flushing and video inspection maintenance services, extending the contract term through June 30, 2027, increasing the total base contract amount by $255,696, and increasing contract total from $793,490 to $1,049,186 (Attachment 1);
  3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to increase the annual project contingency from $10,000 per year to $15,000 per year for Fiscal Year (FY) 26-27; and
  4. Authorize the City Manager to execute the proposed amendment, approve minor non-substantive modifications if necessary, and execute all related documents, with the City Clerk attesting to the agreement subject to approval by the City Attorney.

17.e

APPROVE THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ON-CALL LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES WITH MERCHANTS LANDSCAPE SERVICES, INC. - 26-PW-012

CEQA: Determine that this action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15378(b)(5) (administrative activities)
(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Determine that the First Amendment to the Maintenance Services with Merchants Landscape Services, Inc. is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 (b)(5) (administrative activities);
  2. Approve the proposed First Amendment to the agreement with Merchants Landscape Services, Inc. for On-call Landscape Maintenance Services, extending the contract term through June 30, 2027, increasing the total base contract amount by $623,663, and the total contract amount from $2,173,789 to $2,797,452 (Attachment 1);
  3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to increase the annual project contingency from $65,000 to $100,000 per year for Fiscal Year (FY) 26-27; and
  4. Authorize the City Manager to execute the proposed amendment, approve minor non-substantive modifications if necessary, and execute all related documents, with the City Clerk attesting to the agreement subject to approval by the City Attorney.

17.f

INFORMATIONAL REPORT ON THE COST EVAULATION AND STAFFING MODELS TO INCREASE PUBLIC SAFETY PRESENCE ON THE STRAND, BEACH, AND PARKS - 26-PD-007

Robert Aronoff

More enforcement is necessary. I like Option 1. I live on the The Strand and witness first hand the constant and voluminous e-bike violations. This past Saturday I observed HBPD has officers doing e-bike enforcement at 2nd and Strand. The workd got out very quickly and just the fact that enforcement was in progress cut in my estimate 90% of the violations. The violators suddenly weren't there. Enforcement is effective.

Vincent Busam

Looking at ways to make Hermosa safer, a LOT of attention recently has been focused on e-bikes. What has been missed is motor vehicle safety, where many people have been killed in collisions in and around our city the past few years, including two of our local students. If we're ready to fund increased e-bike enforcement, we should also be ready to proportionally fund improvements to motor vehicle safety. This could come in the form of increased patrolling, but a better way would be to collaborate with our neighboring beach cities and CalTrans on improving safety on our shared roads - PCH & Aviation, by physically modifying the streets to discourage dangerous driving.

tonyhiggins

I fully support offloading the Hbpd but i hope will have time to for more speeding enforcement busy residential collector roads like Ardmore, Prospect, Valley dr, 27th and Gould adjacent to Valley Park where not a single speeding ticket has bern issued in over two years according to a recent public records request. For details tap/click on the above pdf. thank you for considering, tonyhiggins

Informational items are for discussion only. No action will be taken. A Council majority may request an action item to return at a future meeting.
(Police Chief Landon Phillips)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council receive an informational report on the cost evaluation and staffing models to increase public safety presence on the Strand, the beach, and City parks, and provide direction, if so desired.

18.

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

This is the time for Councilmembers to schedule future agenda items and to ask questions about the status of previously approved future agenda items. No discussion, debate, or public comment will be taken. Councilmembers should consider the city's work plan when considering new items. The tentative future agenda items document is provided for information only. 

18.a

TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS - 26-CMO-017

Attached is the current list of tentative future agenda items for Council’s information.

19.

CITY MANAGER REPORT

20.

INFORMATIONAL ITEMS

This is reserved for items that do not require City Council action. The City Council may request a future agenda item to discuss an informational item. Otherwise, discussion of informational items will not be taken. 

20.a

ACTION MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 21, 2026

(Associate Engineer Andrew Nguyen)

20.b

ACTION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 17, 2026

(Community Development Director Alison Becker)

21.

ADJOURNMENT