CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting Agenda

Tuesday, April 08, 2025

Closed Session - 5:00 PM and Open Session - 6:00 PM

Council Chambers

1315 Valley Drive

Hermosa Beach, CA 90254

CITY COUNCIL
Dean Francois, Mayor  
Rob Saemann, Mayor Pro Tem
Mike Detoy, Councilmember 
Ray Jackson, Councilmember
Michael D. Keegan, Councilmember

David Pedersen, City Treasurer

APPOINTED OFFICIALS
Suja Lowenthal, City Manager 
Patrick Donegan, City Attorney 

EXECUTIVE TEAM
Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director
Myra Maravilla, City Clerk
Lisa Nichols, Community Resources Director
Angela Crespi, Deputy City Manager
Paul LeBaron, Police Chief 
Joe SanClemente, Public Works Director
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990 

To comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Assistive Listening Devices (ALD) are available for check out at the meeting. If you require special assistance to participate in this meeting, you must call or submit your request in writing to the Office of the City Clerk at [phone] or at at least 48 hours before the meeting. 

 

PARTICIPATION AND VIEWING OPTIONS  

Hermosa Beach City Council meetings are open to the public and are being held in person in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. Public comment is only guaranteed to be taken in person at City Hall during the meeting or prior to the meeting by submitting an eComment for an item on the agenda. As a courtesy only, the public may view and participate on action items listed on the agenda via the following: 

 

• Zoom: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89968207828? pwd=bXZmWS83dmxHWDZLbWRTK2RVaUxaUT092 
• Phone: Toll Free: [phone]; Meeting ID: 899 6820 7828, then #; Passcode: 472825 
• Comment:  Submit an eComment no later than three (3) hours before the meeting start time.
• Supplemental Email: Supplemental emails are available for agenda items only and must be sent to . Supplemental emails should indicate the agenda item and meeting date in the subject line and must be received no later than three (3) hours before the meeting start time. Emails received after the deadline but before the meeting ends will be posted to the agenda the next business day. 

 

Please be advised that while the City will endeavor to ensure these remote participation methods are available, the City does not guarantee that they will be technically feasible or work all the time. Further, the City reserves the right to terminate these remote participation methods (subject to Brown Act restrictions) at any time and for whatever reason. Please attend in person or by submitting an eComment to ensure your public participation.  

 

Similarly, as a courtesy, the City will also plan to broadcast the meeting via the following listed mediums. However, these are done as a courtesy only and not guaranteed to be technically feasible. Thus, in order to guarantee live time viewing and/or public participation, members of the public shall attend in Council Chambers. 

 

• Cable TV: Spectrum Channel 8 and Frontier Channel 31 in Hermosa Beach 
• YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/CityofHermosaBeach90254 
• Live Stream: www.hermosabeach.gov/agenda
• Cablecast App: Available on supported devices and smart TVs

 

If you experience technical difficulties while viewing a meeting on any of our digital platforms, please try another viewing option. View City Council staff reports and attachments at www.hermosabeach.gov/agenda.  

---

1.

CLOSED SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 5:00 PM

2.

ROLL CALL

3.

PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSED SESSION AGENDA

This Public Comment period is limited to Closed Session agenda items only. Public Comment is limited to three (3) minutes per speaker.

4.

RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION

4.a

MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session held on March 25, 2025

4.b

PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Pursuant to Government Code section 54957

Title: City Attorney

5.

OPEN SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM

6.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

7.

ROLL CALL

8.

CLOSED SESSION REPORT

9.

ANNOUNCEMENTS—UPCOMING CITY EVENTS

10.

APPROVAL OF AGENDA

This is the time for the City Council to discuss any changes to the order of agenda items.

• Recommended Action:

  To approve the order of the agenda.

11.

PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS

12.

CITY MANAGER REPORT

12.a

PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR UPDATE

12.b

POLICE CHIEF UPDATE

13.

PUBLIC COMMENT

tony higgins

please see heads_should_roll pdf above. thank you anthony higgins

This is the time for members of the public to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction and on items where public comment will not be taken (City Manager Reports, City Councilmember Comments, Consent Calendar items not pulled for separate consideration, and Future Agenda Items).

The public is invited to attend and provide public comment. Public comments are limited to two minutes per speaker and shall only be taken from those present in City Council Chambers. No remote public comment will be taken during this time unless required by the Brown Act. A total of thirty minutes will be allocated to this initial public participation item. This time allotment may be modified due to time constraints at the discretion of the Mayor or City Council. Another period is also reserved for general comment later in the meeting for those who could not be heard at this time.

No action will be taken on matters raised during public comment, except that the Council may take action to schedule issues raised during public comment for a future agenda. Speakers with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are encouraged to submit those comments directly to the City Manager. Members of the audience will have a future opportunity to speak on items pulled from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion, Public Hearings, and Municipal Matters when those items are heard.

14.

CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS

14.a

UPDATES FROM CITY COUNCIL AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEES AND STANDING COMMITTEE DELEGATES/ALTERNATES

15.

CONSENT CALENDAR

The following matters will be acted upon collectively with a single motion and vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. Councilmembers may orally register a negative vote on any Consent Calendar item without pulling the item for separate consideration before the vote on the Consent Calendar. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember removes an item from the Consent Calendar, either under Approval of the Agenda or under this item before the vote on the Consent Calendar. Items removed for separate discussion will be provided a separate public comment period.

• Recommended Action:

  To approve the consent calendar.

15.a

WAIVE READING IN FULL OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ON THE AGENDA

Recommendation: 
Staff recommends City Council waive reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions on the agenda and declare that said titles which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

15.b

CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - 25-CCO-021

(City Clerk Myra Maravilla)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council approve the minutes for the March 25, 2025 Regular Meeting.

15.c

VACANCY ON THE BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS—AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT AND SCHEDULE APPLICANT INTERIVEWS - 25-CCO-018

(City Clerk Myra Maravilla)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Direct staff to advertise and solicit applications for one vacancy on the Building Board of Appeals for an undefined term, to serve at the pleasure of the City Council; and
  2. Schedule applicant interviews to be held prior to the regular City Council meeting on Tuesday, May 27, 2025, with the option to make an appointment at the same meeting.

15.d

RENEWAL OF GENERAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH AND LOS ANGELES COUNTY - 25-CMO-028

CEQA: Determine the renewal of the General Services Agreement is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act.
(Deputy City Manager Angela Crespi)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council adopt a resolution (Attachment 1) authorizing the Mayor to execute a five-year General Services Agreement between the City of Hermosa Beach and Los Angeles County (Attachment 2).

15.e

CHECK REGISTERS - 25-AS-031

(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council ratify the following check registers for the period March 19, 2025 through March 26, 2025. The Administrative Services Director certifies the accuracy of the attached demands.

15.f

FISCAL YEAR 2023–2024 ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT (INCLUDING REPORT FROM INDEPENDENT AUDITOR) - 25-AS-033

(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council receive and file the FY 2023–24 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) (Attachment 1), which includes the report from Gruber and Lopez, Inc., the City’s independent auditors.

15.g

SIDE LETTER TO THE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES’ MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING - 25-AS-032

tony higgins

Dear City Council, Im all for a uniform allowance for line-level sworn officers who may experience extreme wear & tear on their uniforms as a function of their day to day duties. But if I'm reading this right and the city is giving a $1000 annual uniform allowance to Chiefs & Captains that already make between $300-500,000 in total compensation; well i think that deserves a closer look. tony higgins

Anthony Higgins

Dear City Council, Im all for a uniform allowance for line-level sworn officers who may experience extreme wear & tear on their uniforms as a function of their day to day duties. But if in reading this right and the city is giving a $1000 annual uniform allowance to Chiefs & Captains that already make between $300-500 in total compensation; well i think that deserves a closer look. tony higgins

(Human Resources Manager Tiffany Nguyen)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council approve the Resolution and Side Letter to the Management Employees’ Memorandum of Understanding (Attachment 1).

15.h

ACTION MINUTES OF THE PARKS, RECREATION, AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 4, 2025 - 25-CR-033

(Community Resources Director Lisa Nichols)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council receive and file the action minutes of the Parks, Recreation, and Community Resources Advisory Commission meeting of March 4, 2025.

15.i

APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE BEACH CITIES WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GROUP FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COORDINATED INTEGRATED MONITORING PROGRAM (CIMP) - 25-CMO-026

(Environmental Programs Manager Douglas Krauss)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Approve an amendment to a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) regarding the Administration and Cost Sharing for Coordination and Implementation of the Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Program (CIMP) for the Beach Cities Watershed Management Group (WMG) (Attachment 1) to extend the term of the agreement through December 31, 2026, with the option to further extend the term in increments of one calendar year at a time, up to two additional years; and
  2. Authorize the Mayor to execute and the City Clerk to attest to the proposed amendment, subject to approval by the City Attorney.

15.j

ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL MAP NO. 83937 FOR AN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING CONDOMINIUM LOCATED AT 705 2ND STREET - 25-CDD-055

CEQA: Determine that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
(Associate Planner Jake Whitney)

• Recommended Action:
  1. Determine that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act;
  2. Adopt a resolution (Attachment 1) approving Final Parcel Map No. 83937 (Attachment 2), which is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Parcel Map; and
  3. Authorize the City Clerk to endorse the certificate for said map.

16.

PUBLIC HEARINGS—TO COMMENCE AT 6:30 P.M

16.a

REQUEST FOR A ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT (TA 25-01), PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF TEMPORARY USES AND EVENTS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, AMENDING HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE (HBMC): 1) CHAPTER 17.04 - 25-CDD-054

Elaine Kim

Dear Honorable Mayor and Hermosa Beach City Councilmembers, I am writing in strong support of the proposed Zoning Text Amendment (TA 25-01) to update the City’s regulations on temporary uses and events. These changes are not only timely—they are essential to fostering a vibrant, resilient, and economically diverse Hermosa Beach. As a resident and active member of this community, I’ve seen how outdated event policies have limited creative expression, discouraged cultural participation, and left untapped the economic potential of local gatherings. The proposed updates represent a much-needed shift toward a more business-friendly, community-centered framework that aligns with the City’s vision for thriving neighborhoods and inclusive local commerce. Community Events Fuel Economic Growth Temporary events—whether pop-ups, artist showcases, wellness gatherings, or cultural celebrations—are proven catalysts for local economic development. A 2023 report by Americans for the Arts found that arts and cultural events generate $31.47 in spending per person, per event beyond admission costs—boosting nearby restaurants, retailers, and service providers. Additionally, the Brookings Institution has shown that creative placemaking initiatives, including temporary events, help reinvigorate underutilized spaces and attract foot traffic, investment, and talent. The Cypress District—with its industrial charm and creative potential—is ideal for this kind of activation. Yet current zoning regulations hinder that opportunity. Local Events Strengthen Community and Safety Small, well-regulated events aren’t just enjoyable—they’re critical for community connection. Research from the Knight Foundation shows that social offerings like arts and cultural events are a top driver of community attachment—ranking even higher than economic opportunity. Permitting more frequent, accessible events strengthens Hermosa Beach’s identity as a creative, inclusive, and connected city. Importantly, the proposed code updates maintain thoughtful guardrails. Limits on event frequency, duration, and high-impact holidays ensure neighborhood compatibility while still encouraging vibrancy. Reducing Barriers Unlocks Opportunity Perhaps most significantly, TA 25-01 lowers financial and bureaucratic hurdles that often stifle small businesses, nonprofits, and creatives. By streamlining permitting and modernizing parking rules, the City makes it easier for local entrepreneurs and artists to share their work, test new ideas, and build community—without needing costly venues. This kind of grassroots economic activation is vital in today’s landscape. According to the U.S. Small Business Administration, micro-enterprises (with fewer than 10 employees) comprise 75% of all U.S. businesses. Forward-thinking policies that remove access barriers foster equity, innovation, and long-term resilience. In closing, TA 25-01 is a smart, future-focused amendment that honors what makes Hermosa Beach unique: its creative spirit, engaged residents, and local-first values. By supporting temporary uses and events, the City Council can bolster local businesses, revitalize spaces, and nourish the civic soul of Hermosa. Thank you for your leadership and commitment to inclusive, forward-looking policy

Theodosia Marchant

Dear City Council Members, I’m writing as a collector and artist to express support for Agenda Item 16.a. and the proposed updates to the Temporary Event rules. I urge the Council to approve the Planning Commission’s recommendations. I've been attending art events in the Cypress area of Hermosa for over seven years. It's been amazing to see how the scene has grown—increasingly, it's attracting an eclectic mix of collectors. The events are always vibrant, engaging, and family-friendly, showcasing a great mix of talent, from emerging voices to more established names from the U.S. and internationally. Cypress has really become a fantastic addition to the Hermosa art community. Thank you Theodosia Marchant

Aimee Mandala

I’m writing as a patron and artist volunteer of ShockBoxx Gallery in the M-1 Arts District to express support for Agenda Item 16.a. and the proposed updates to the Temporary Event rules. I strongly urge the Council to approve the Planning Commission’s recommendations. Our district is home to a vibrant creative community, and small events are critical to our business model, community engagement, and economic sustainability. The current and proposed restrictions are still too limiting for the way creative businesses operate today. We urge you to support a flexible, business-friendly approach that lets us thrive while maintaining safety and community standards.

adam malovani

In order to help our businesses and increase vibrancy in Hb, we need to make it easier and less expensive to host minor special events. Here are a few recommendations related to Temporary Minor Special Events (in the commercial downtown zone). 1) Frequency: Increase allowable frequency of events from 18 to 24. Two per month year round is reasonable. 2) Lighting: Eliminate the restriction on moving lights. 3) Parking: - Remove the requirement to maintain ADA parking within event-designated lots. It would not be safe or practical to have someone park while an event is occurring in a parking lot. Alternatively, a parking spot outside of the event parking lot could be designated as an ADA spot during the event. - Eliminate the requirement for a "temporary parking demand management plan". The occasional use of small private parking lots for events has negligible effects on overall parking accessibility. Moreover, the Coastal Commission has not mandated a temporary parking plan. Eliminating unnecessary requirements reduces administrative burdens on businesses and city staff while allowing for more seamless event planning. 4) Allow a single permit application and fee to cover multiple event programs and layouts. Thank you! Adam Malovani

Andrea Jacobsson

I oppose the Planning Commission's suggestion to City Council that the use of Temporary Event Permits and Special Event Permits be expanded in any way. The Studio/Rule No. 9 applied for a business permit as a “Digital Capturing Facility and Studio.” Yet, event rentals, large gatherings, (not micro events), sale of alcohol (without ABC permits), and a patio which is described as “cannabis friendly” are currently operating. No business in Downtown Hermosa with a CUP would be allowed to sell alcohol and smoke pot without code enforcement shutting them down. There is no space available to create an Arts Zone, within Hermosa’s light Industrial zone. There are no available warehouses so this new change will currently help only one business. There have been no parking studies or standard requirements done for the large assembly of people that The Studio attracts. Besides, the M1 zone prohibits assembly of people. Code enforcement has ignored the sale of alcohol and smoking of cannabis. This district does not deserve preferential treatment and the ability to compete with Hermosa’s downtown businesses while paying low rent. On the other hand, Hermosa’s downtown commercial district may benefit from loosening of regulations. In conclusion, this rule change should not benefit one business, who has violated State and City government regulations with a work-around and easing of the extra temporary event permit or special event permit. PLEASE OPPOSE!

Laura Pena

Dear Mayor, Council, and Staff - I appreciate the City’s approach to modernize event permitting, but we need to ask ourselves what is the goal? The Limited Events and TMSEP permits both have the potential to boost foot traffic, promote creativity, and help our businesses thrive. So let’s keep that in mind as we make changes. I support the long-term vision for the Cypress District, which calls for “flexible use spaces, co-working offices, and creative or ‘maker’ industries.” I hope to see it grow into a lively arts and culture hub. But to make that happen, we need to reexamine permitted uses and remove unnecessary barriers that prevent small businesses from activating their spaces. As I’ve shared in many prior public comments, our businesses, especially in our sales-tax producing districts need flexibility, particularly in the off-season. The following improvements to the TMSEP would better align with our city’s goals: 1. FREQUENCY • Issue: 36 days are allowed, but only 18 total events are permitted downtown. • Recommendation: At minimum, allow full use of 36 days, or three events/month (matching Limited Events). 2. RESTRICTED DAYS • Issue: Blanket prohibition on key holidays may not reflect actual safety needs. • Recommendation: Use HbPD data to review service needs and determine necessary restrictions. 3. LIGHTING • Issue: TMSEP bans “moving lights,” limiting low-impact setups like silent discos. • Recommendation: Remove this restriction to support creative but responsible events. 4. PARKING • Issue: TMSEP requires parking plans for lots over 5 spaces, plus ADA restrictions. • Recommendation: Remove or adjust this rule to reflect realistic parking demand and allow flexibility for our walkable downtown. 5. EXCEPTIONS • Issue: Any deviation requires a costly CUP—over $6,000—creating a major barrier. • Recommendation: Eliminate this clause or tie it to broader use policy discussions. 6. REVOCATION • Issue: TMSEP permits can be revoked without cause with just 24 hours’ notice. • Recommendation: Require a minimum 72-hour written notice unless it’s a safety issue. Future permit denials should require cause. These changes would create a more balanced and accessible system that allows businesses to invest in creative, community-friendly activations without facing unnecessary red tape. As always, I appreciate your thoughtful consideration. Laura Pena

Tara McNamara Stabile

Hi Mayor and Councilmembers, I am a proud Hermosa Beach resident and Loma Drive property owner. I’m writing to express my strong support for Agenda Item 16.a., which addresses updates to the Temporary Events zoning regulations. As someone who regularly attends fundraisers and community events in the Cypress Arts District, I’ve seen firsthand how these gatherings bring people together in meaningful ways. They help local causes, give emerging creatives a platform, and build the kind of community connection that makes Hermosa Beach so special. Thank you for your continued leadership and support of our local culture and creative economy. Warmly, Tara McNamara Stabile Hermosa Beach Resident & Loma Drive Property Owner

Mike Collins

Dear City Council Members, Please make a non-political, common sense decision tonight. Please listen to the people in the community that speak with reason and logic. This issue has been before council in the past, and continues to be fueled by a political revenge tour spearheaded by one, or a very small handful, of disgruntled residents that have taken aim at community members whose ideologies they disagree with. The joke, hate and vitriol have gone too far and you have the power to help right the ship. In 2019 (yes, it's been that long) we suspected that a local resident who does not live anywhere near Cypress Avenue had begun making complaints about art shows in the area. To prove our point that these complaints were being made in the absence of noise or problems, and were perhaps driven by revenge, hate or boredom, we began making art show flyers for, "Events," that were not actually happening. Why? To prove a point of how absurd this issue had become, we'd post the flyers and then code enforcement would show up to a gallery that was locked, silent and completely vacant to inquire about a noise complaint of loud music and people spilling into the street, stating that they had received a phone call from a local resident. On one such occasion the code enforcement officer phoned us and wanted to know why the gallery was locked and empty when she had been informed of a loud art show. For those of you that were on council then, we are sure you recall. For those of you who have been to a gathering on Cypress, you have the platform to speak the truth tonight. We hope you choose that path. I’m writing as a business owner in the M-1 Arts District to express support for Agenda Item 16.a. and the proposed updates to the Temporary Event rules. I strongly urge the Council to approve the Planning Commission’s recommendations. Our district is home to a vibrant creative community, and small events are critical to our business model, community engagement, and economic sustainability. The current and proposed restrictions are still too limiting for the way creative businesses operate today. We urge you to support a flexible, business-friendly approach that lets us thrive while maintaining safety and community standards. Sincerely, Mike Collins ShockBoxx

Kathleen Knoll

To: Hermosa Beach City Council Subject: Item 16a Recommendations for Temporary Special Event Permit Process Dear Mayor and Council Members, As a business owner who has utilized these permits for the past 13 years, I would like to share my comments and recommendations regarding the future of this program and process. The original intent of the Temporary Special Event Permit was to help businesses create innovative ways to enhance revenue. However, the current process has become overly cumbersome, discouraging participation. In the past, businesses could easily apply and receive approval for 4-12 events per year. Now, the process requires all dates to be submitted upfront, professionally scaled renderings (even though the ABC only requires a hand-drawn diagram), and a non-refundable $600 fee if the permit is denied. This current process has become confusing , time consuming and contradicts the original purpose of the permit, which was to support business growth. Thank you to staff for trying to find ways to streamline the TMSEP. We respectfully request the following modifications to the staff’s recommendations: •Frequency - Events 36 days per year—to be used how the business would like - NOT limited to 18 events/ 2 times a month. We would like flexibility to be successful and adapt to the demand of our customers • Do not restrict “moving lights”. This type of lighting is standard for events. • Allow events on holidays and during summer—if conflicts arise, the Chief of Police can deny applications as needed. Take out “prohibited” days. • Eliminate parking requirements—this has never been an issue in the past. Hermosa Beach is a highly walkable city where most visitors bike, walk, or visit multiple businesses in one trip. FEE STRUCTURE NEEDS TO BE AFFORDABLE • Permit date flexibility—businesses should be allowed to change event dates with a nominal or no fee. • No fee if a permit is denied—this is standard practice in neighboring cities like Manhattan Beach and Redondo Beach. The process is already costly and time-consuming for business owners, who must also cover event expenses. If the costs become too high, businesses may opt out altogether, reducing community engagement. If council has concerns about any of these changes may I suggest a 2 year trial to see what issues may come up. I really appreciate your time and consideration of these recommendations, which aim to make the process more business-friendly while maintaining necessary oversight. I am also in Support of item A2 but would like the city to also allow mobile homes temporary use on multifamily development projects Sincerely, Kathy Knoll Uncorked Wine Shops

Michelle Crispin

On behalf of the Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce and Visitors Bureau, I am writing in support of Item 16.a, which includes proposed amendments to the Temporary Minor Special Event Permit (TMSEP) process and the M-1 Lighting District regulations. The current zoning code governing events and lighting is outdated, restrictive, and a barrier to innovation and economic vitality. Our community has evolved, and the tools we use to support local businesses, cultural programming, and creative use of public spaces must evolve as well. Over the past several months, the Chamber has worked with city staff, businesses, and event stakeholders to identify solutions that are more aligned with the realities of today's event production and activation. We commend the Planning Commission for approving the majority of these forward-thinking recommendations. These changes would streamline permitting for smaller-scale events and improve flexibility within the M-1 Lighting District - ultimately supporting more frequent and vibrant community engagement opportunities. We believe these updates will create a more business-friendly, accessible and dynamic environment while still maintaining necessary oversight and safety standards. We respectfully urge the City Council to adopt the proposed amendments under Item 16.a and continue to work in partnership with the Chamber and local businesses to ensure Hermosa remains a welcoming place for creative, community-driven experiences. Thank you for your consideration, Hermosa Beach Chamber of Commerce and Visitors Bureau Note: Board member Jessica Accamando has abstained from the Chamber Board's vote on this matter due to her business's proximity to the M-1 zone.

tony higgins

Dear City Council, i recommend caution. The city just spent $325,000 on a Parks Masterplan where the vast majority of residents concluded the city doesn't have too many or too few special events, but about the right number. That means something! So what is the first thing staff does? It changes a policy so we dont count Level 3 impact film shoots in the Level 3 impact schedule, even though they can have the same resident impact as any Level 3 special event. Then last week staff proposed a LA Kings event that will put us 8 days over the event days for next sept. Now this proposal for even more events loopholes and im sure the Chamber will want more as the Olympics & World Cup approach. The City has refused to ask which existing events have broad community support and which can be eliminated. As I said, the RESIDENTS have told you in a loud voice in the $325k Parks Masterplan Process that we have about the right number of Level 1,2 & 3 events. The Chamber will always want more but there is a resident quality of life impact. Proceed with caution and keep the total number of events in our small 1.4 Sq mile city about the same. If you want to add events then it makes sense to eliminate others or what is the point of policy limits. anthony Higgins

Russ Gilbert

This measure could not come at a better time, as Hermosa Beach is in urgent need of events and gatherings that will bring visitors into our city to engage with our businesses and unique culture. People who come for events on Cypress will likely stay to dine on Pier and Hermosa Ave, pay for parking, etc. We need more of this kind of thinking ASAP. Lifting onerous restrictions on an area of town that already has the space for events, minimal exposure for residents to be inconvenienced or bothered, and is already host to multiple art galleries, event spaces, and production facilities. I live just one block from the Cypress district on Loma and to date have only benefitted from events in the impacted area. We've had concerts, parties, art events, even wellness sessions like yoga. I also applaud the city's approach of addressing rules for each area of the city individually vs the "one size fits all" approach we criticize so heavily when it comes from Sacramento. Regulation that makes sense on Pier or Hermosa Ave or PCH may or may not make sense on Cypress or in other places, so I hope we'll see more of this "Carve out" approach in the future. Don't get distracted by Petty nonsense, please pass this ASAP!

Jessica Accamando

Hermosa Beach City Council 1315 Valley Drive Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Subject: Support for Zoning Code Amendments – Agenda Item 16.a. with Additional Enhancements Dear Mayor and City Council Members, As the owners of The Studio (studiohermosa.com), located in the M-1 zone of the Cypress Avenue Arts District, we appreciate your ongoing efforts to modernize the zoning code and better support small, creative businesses in Hermosa Beach. We are writing in support of Agenda Item 16.a. on your upcoming agenda, and specifically, we encourage you to move forward with approval of the Planning Commission’s recommendations with a couple key enhancements that will better serve our community and economic ecosystem. Our business regularly hosts small-scale, micro-events that are aligned with our business model and fully compliant with our licensing. These events—ranging from recorded workshops to creative filming nights—are not only central to our mission but also help build community, support local artists, and bring vitality to the area. We are eager to continue working with the City to grow the Arts District into the vibrant, creative, community-focused space we know it can be. With thoughtful enhancements to this zoning code update, we can create an environment where small businesses, artists, and residents all thrive. Thank you for your time and consideration. Warm regards, Jessica Accamando Co-Owner, The Studio

Carolyn Petty

I agree with events in the Commercial Zone, but completely disagree with this carve out for essentially one business owner in the M1 Zone who has successfully lobbied for this. This is NOT consistent with our General Plan and the staff report is blatantly misstating the truth by saying it IS consistent. The General Plan was the result of thousands of hours of community involvement over several years. The uses in the M1 were carefully considered and the decision was that this remain Light Industrial. This was a purposeful decision in order to protect current businesses and set aside opportunities for more light industrial use. Not to mention sensitivity to the possibility that different uses could drive up rents, driving out the businesses we want to protect and nurture. The listing of allowable uses is pretty shocking and it is clear that this was specifically tailored for Jessica Accamendo – the person who ensured the Chamber of Commerce took no position on the proposed sales tax increase AND served as the proxy for the city in running the advocacy campaign to promote the sales tax increase. So this is essentially the quid-pro-quo for doing her part in trying to pass the sales tax increase. Quid pro quo may be the standard in Long Beach, but it is entirely inappropriate in Hermosa Beach. I do not believe the neighbors were notified that if this is passed, her business and others can now legally run events ( nobody believes the cap will be adhered to) as often as she wants, with alcohol, amplified sound and no parking requirements. There is no mention of occupancy load and requirement of ADA and fire life safety standards. So if this is approved, she can have as many people as she wants crammed into her building with no safety standards. This would never be permitted anywhere in our commercial zone, so why is she getting special treatment? This should completely stop and be voted down. But if you are not going to vote it down, at a bare minimum, all residents who live within 500’ should be notified so they understand the impacts. As we all know, the city spent about $1.8M illegally shutting down Crossfit, initiated by the neighbors on Loma. Has the city said a word to anyone over there? Why was the city so insistent on shutting down a gym, but now is bending over backwards to allow a business owner to run parties whenever she pleases?

Laura Pena

Dear Mayor, Council, and Staff - I recommend including mobile homes as temporary residences (17.42.150 A2.) for multi-family development projects not just new single-family homes which offers several practical, equitable, and policy-aligned benefits. Encourages Owner-Initiated Development: Allowing temporary on-site living supports property owners who are actively involved in developing or redeveloping their property. Whether it's a new duplex, triplex, or larger multi-family structure, this provision creates a more inclusive policy for owner-builders and small-scale infill developers. Supports Housing and Reduces Displacement: Staying on-site in a mobile home reduces the financial burden on property owners who might otherwise need to pay for temporary housing while incurring construction costs. This is especially important for property owners focused on adding attainable housing. Improves Project Oversight and Timeliness: Owners who reside on-site can more closely monitor construction progress, reduce delays, and coordinate with contractor, often resulting in more efficient project delivery and fewer complaints. Consistency Across Use Types: Limiting this provision to single-family homes creates an artificial and unnecessary distinction. Many major remodels and multi-family projects involve construction scopes that also preclude safe habitation. Aligning policy across use types ensures fairness and recognizes the intensity of modern construction. Aligns with Broader Housing Goals: This minor zoning flexibility supports broader goals around infill housing, missing middle development, and streamlined project delivery, particularly in our city where we continually face housing shortages or under pressure from state housing mandates. I appreciate your thoughtful consideration. Laura Pena

REGARDING DEFINITIONS; 2) CHAPTER 17.28 REGARDING M-1 LIGHT MANUFACTURING ZONE; AND 3) CHAPTER 17.42 REGARDING GENERAL PROVISIONS, CONDITIONS AND EXCEPTIONAL USES.

CEQA: The project qualified for a Categorical Exemption per Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
(Planning Manager Alexis Oropeza)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Conduct a public hearing to consider amendments to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code pertaining to temporary use and temporary events;
  2. Determine whether the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act; and
  3. Introduce by title only and waive first reading of an Ordinance of the City of Hermosa Beach, California, approving Zoning Text Amendment (25-01) (Attachment 1).

17.

MUNICIPAL MATTERS

17.a

REVIEW OF DAY AT THE BEACH EVENTS’ REQUEST FOR A NEW AGREEMENT FOR THE HERMOSA BEACH OPEN IN 2025 THROUGH 2027 - 25-CR-034

CEQA: Review of Day at the Beach Events’ request for a new agreement would be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15304. This would have negligible or no permanent effect on the environment.
(Community Resources Director Lisa Nichols)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Receive and file the informational report of the comparing the terms of the approved Long-term Agreement (LTA) with Day at the Beach Events (DATBE) for the Hermosa Beach Open (HBO) from 2025 through 2027 with those of an alternative agreement structure requested by DATBE, in which the City would serve as the event owner; and
  2. Provide direction to staff on next steps.

17.b

RENAMING THE GREENBELT PEDESTRIAN TRAIL WITH A BENCH DEDICATED TO THE ACCESS HERMOSA WORKING GROUP AND IN MEMORIAM OF GEOFF HIRSCH AND CASEY ROHRER, AND RENAMING THE SOUTH PARK ACCESSIBLE PLAYGROUND IN HONOR OF CASEY ROHRER - 25-CR-035

David Grethen

Section 1 of the resolution is ambiguous because it does not specify applicability between Pier and 8th only, suggesting that the new name will apply to the entire Greenbelt. Section 1 is inconsistent with this intent as stated in preceding recitals.

Carolyn Petty

Naming rights should only be conferred in circumstances in which the people were highly significant contributors or benefactors to the community or the country. For instance, Zamperini airport is Torrance is named after Louis Zamperini who was an Olympian, a WWII veteran who became a Prisoner of War when he was captured by opposing forces. What a incredible person and American he was. He sacrificed for our country and was a longtime Torrance resident. It important that something of this significance is used rarely, judiciously, and thoughtfully, and ONLY when the body of evidence of their community contributions are astounding and overwhelming, as in the case of Zamperini. Otherwise, it diminishes the value and significance of such an acknowledgement. By the way, the vast majority of our community does not agree with what you did to our greenbelt, but they were eventually worn down by a City Council that was only responding to a handful of residents. If this had been put to a vote, it would have been resoundingly defeated. You took a beautiful nature trail that was peaceful and quiet and installed ugly white/yellow dirt that is aesthetically unappealing. And you spent $1,000,000 of taxpayer money to do this. If you are going to recognize anyone, recognize the people who made the greenbelt possible.

Howard Lee two

Click/Tap this comment and then Click/Tap the attachement to read comment / prior eComments.

Howard Lee

Where are the eComments from the prior meeting when this item was not heard and was moved to this meeting?

CEQA: Approval of the renaming of the Greenbelt Pedestrian Trail and South Park Accessible Playground would be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15304. The proposed renaming of each facility will have negligible or no permanent effect on the environment.
(Community Resources Director Lisa Nichols)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Receive and file the Greenbelt Pedestrian Trail and South Park Accessible Playground Renaming Joint Subcommittee (Subcommittee) Report (Attachment 1);
  2. Adopt a resolution renaming the Greenbelt Pedestrian Trail from Pier Avenue to 8th Street to the Greenbelt Accessible Trail (Attachment 2);
  3. Approve the installation of a bench and plaque on the Greenbelt Pedestrian Trail dedicated to the Access Hermosa Working Group and in memoriam of Geoff Hirsch and Casey Rohrer; and
  4. Per the Parks, Recreation, and Community Resources Advisory Commission (Commission) recommendation:
     1. Adopt a resolution renaming the South Park accessible playground in honor of Casey Rohrer (Attachment 3); and
     2. Approve the installation of a commemorative plaque on an existing bench near the South Park accessible playground.

17.c

APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., TO PROVIDE CROSSING GUARD SERVICES - 25-PD-005

(Police Chief Paul LeBaron)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Approve a Professional Services Agreement (Attachment 3) with All City Management Services, Inc., to provide crossing guard services at an annual not-to-exceed amount of $315,315 for year one and a three-year term, beginning July 1, 2025 and ending July 1, 2028;
  2. Authorize the City Manager to extend up to two one-year terms; and
  3. Authorize the City Manager to execute and the City Clerk to attest to the proposed agreement, subject to approval by the City Attorney.

17.d

CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION EXPRESSING OPPOSITION FOR SENATE BILL 79 (WIENER) - 25-CMO-029

Jeff Kiernan

Thank you for considering an opposition position on SB 79. Cal Cities is working to inform our members about this bad bill as it would take away local land use control on properties owned by transit agencies without requiring ANY housing to be built. Local elected and appointed city leaders in consultation with the community should determine the height, density, and design of local development projects - not transit agencies!

(Deputy City Manager Angela Crespi)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Consider adopting by title a resolution expressing opposition to Senate Bill 79 (Attachment 1); and
  2. Authorize the Mayor to send a letter (Attachment 2) expressing the City’s position.

18.

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

This is the time for Councilmembers to schedule future agenda items and to ask questions about the status of previously approved future agenda items. No discussion, debate, or public comment will be taken. Councilmembers should consider the city's work plan when considering new items. The tentative future agenda items document is provided for information only. 

18.a

TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS - 25-CMO-030

Attached is the current list of tentative future agenda items for Council’s information.

19.

PUBLIC COMMENT

This time is set aside for the public to address the Council on any item of interest within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Council that could not be heard under the first public comment opportunity because there were too many prior public speakers and the thirty-minute maximum time limit was exhausted. 

20.

ADJOURNMENT