CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH
CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting Agenda

Tuesday, May 27, 2025

Closed Session - 5:00 PM and Open Session - 6:00 PM

Council Chambers

1315 Valley Drive

Hermosa Beach, CA 90254

CITY COUNCIL
Rob Saemann, Mayor  
Mike Detoy, Mayor Pro Tem
Ray Jackson, Councilmember 
Michael D. Keegan, Councilmember
Dean Francois, Councilmember

David Pedersen, City Treasurer

APPOINTED OFFICIALS
Joe SanClemente, Interim City Manager / Public Works Director 
Todd Leishman, Interim City Attorney 

EXECUTIVE TEAM
Brandon Walker, Administrative Services Director
Myra Maravilla,City Clerk
Alison Becker, Community Development Director
Lisa Nichols, Community Resources Director
Leo Zalyan, Interim Deputy City Manager
Landon Phillips, Police Chief 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990 

To comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Assistive Listening Devices (ALD) are available for check out at the meeting. If you require special assistance to participate in this meeting, you must call or submit your request in writing to the Office of the City Clerk at [phone] or at at least 48 hours before the meeting. 

 

PARTICIPATION AND VIEWING OPTIONS  

Hermosa Beach City Council meetings are open to the public and are being held in person in the City Hall Council Chambers located at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254. Public comment is only guaranteed to be taken in person at City Hall during the meeting or prior to the meeting by submitting an eComment for an item on the agenda. As a courtesy only, the public may view and participate on action items listed on the agenda via the following: 

 

• Zoom: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89968207828? pwd=bXZmWS83dmxHWDZLbWRTK2RVaUxaUT092 
• Phone: Toll Free: [phone]; Meeting ID: 899 6820 7828, then #; Passcode: 472825 
• Comment:  Submit an eComment no later than three (3) hours before the meeting start time.
• Supplemental Email: Supplemental emails are available for agenda items only and must be sent to . Supplemental emails should indicate the agenda item and meeting date in the subject line and must be received no later than three (3) hours before the meeting start time. Emails received after the deadline but before the meeting ends will be posted to the agenda the next business day. Writings distributed to all, or majority of all, of the City Council after the agenda has been posted shall be available for inspection at the City Clerk's Office located at 1315 Valley Drive, Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 during regular business hours. 

 

Please be advised that while the City will endeavor to ensure these remote participation methods are available, the City does not guarantee that they will be technically feasible or work all the time. Further, the City reserves the right to terminate these remote participation methods (subject to Brown Act restrictions) at any time and for whatever reason. Please attend in person or by submitting an eComment to ensure your public participation.  

 

Similarly, as a courtesy, the City will also plan to broadcast the meeting via the following listed mediums. However, these are done as a courtesy only and not guaranteed to be technically feasible. Thus, in order to guarantee live time viewing and/or public participation, members of the public shall attend in Council Chambers. 

 

• Cable TV: Spectrum Channel 8 and Frontier Channel 31 in Hermosa Beach 
• YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/CityofHermosaBeach90254 
• Live Stream: www.hermosabeach.gov/agenda
• Cablecast App: Available on supported devices and smart TVs

 

If you experience technical difficulties while viewing a meeting on any of our digital platforms, please try another viewing option. View City Council staff reports and attachments at www.hermosabeach.gov/agenda.  

---

1.

CLOSED SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 5:00 PM

2.

ROLL CALL

3.

PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE CLOSED SESSION AGENDA

This Public Comment period is limited to Closed Session agenda items only. Public Comment is limited to three (3) minutes per speaker.

4.

RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION

4.a

MINUTES: Approval of minutes of Closed Session held on Tuesday, May 13, 2025

4.b

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR

Government Code Section 54957.6
City Negotiator: Cynthia Stafford, Human Resources
Employee Organizations: Hermosa Beach Police Officers' Association, Teamsters Union, Local 911, and Professional and Administrative Employee Group

 

4.c

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL:

Initiation of Litigation—Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4)
The City finds, based on advice from legal counsel, that discussion in open session will prejudice the position of the City in the litigation. 
Number of Potential Cases: 1

5.

OPEN SESSION—CALL TO ORDER 6:00 PM

6.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

7.

ROLL CALL

8.

CLOSED SESSION REPORT

9.

ANNOUNCEMENTS—UPCOMING CITY EVENTS

10.

APPROVAL OF AGENDA

This is the time for the City Council to discuss any changes to the order of agenda items.

• Recommended Action:

  To approve the order of the agenda.

11.

PROCLAMATIONS / PRESENTATIONS

11.a

RECOGNIZING AMERICAN YOUTH SOCCER ORGANIZATION WESTERN STATE CHAMPIONS

11.b

RECOGNIZING MENTAL HEALTH AWARENESS MONTH

12.

CITY MANAGER REPORT

12.a

POLICE CHIEF UPDATE

13.

PUBLIC COMMENT

Mary Campbell

Hermosa Beach City Council, You were each elected to serve as part of a unified governing body – one entrusted with stewarding the well-being of our entire community. No single member, nor subset, was granted the authority to act independently or unilaterally. Your obligation is not to personal agendas or private ambitions, but to the collective good of Hermosa Beach. Your role requires thoughtful deliberation, disciplined self-control, and a willingness to listen to all the facts, to each other, and to the voices of our residents. These promises have been broken in recent weeks, along with the good will and wellbeing of our community. It has been a disgraceful display of our expectations for due diligence and due process. Good governance demands transparency, context, and the courage to make balanced decisions in the light of day. That is what builds trust. That is what strengthens and protects our city. And yet, in recent weeks, the actions of the so-called “new majority” have gravely undermined that trust with sudden, non-transparent decisions, reckless disruptions, and a striking absence of explanation or accountability. These behaviors have not only destabilized our city government and staff, they have left residents deeply shaken and rightfully concerned. The silence from this body in the face of passionate community outcry is not just disappointing, it is alarming. Years of progress, stability, and collaborative momentum are being eroded without justification. What’s worse, the cost of this damage – professional, financial, and human – will be felt by all of us for years to come. To my fellow Hermosans – Right now, trust is being shattered before our eyes. These recent actions have been reckless, dismissive, and devoid of empathy. They signal a profound disregard for the people that council members were chosen to represent and is a dangerous departure from the principles of sound governance. I urge you to stay aware, informed and involved. I urge you to demand better. To the City Council – I urge you to work together to shift this tide back toward stability and progress. Unite around the values of good governance that earned you this office. Restore transparency and recommit to integrity and decency. Engage your constituents in meaningful dialogue. Thank you to those of you holding your ground and standing in the fire against the recent recklessness. For those of you who have failed us in the above leadership ideals – know that you will be held accountable. Anything less is unworthy of this community, and unworthy of your oath to serve it. Sincerely, Mary Campbell, Former Mayor & Council Member of Hermosa Beach

Howard Lee

Council: FOR, FOR, FOR. Ignore the non-sense of the die-hard “AGAIST-ers” (who just don’t get it). This is an absolute no-brainer choice. Cut to the chase and make Steven Napolitano the new “permanent” City Manager, ASAP. No need to waste more tax money on a consultant and a 6-month idiot-process like the one that brought us the former dear-in-headlights, costly City Manager. Should be a 5-0 vote to approve as “Interim City Manager”. Howard Lee

Leonard Shapiro

We need more transparency in appointing a new city manager. It’s a $240,000 a year position. There needs to be candidates and accountability. Napolitano is a bald penis-looking puppet installed by Drunk Francois, CHUD Keegan, and Mayor Semen with the pornstar mustache.

Jed Sanford

Please find my attached letter. Regards, Jed Sanford

This is the time for members of the public to address the City Council on any items within the Council's jurisdiction and on items where public comment will not be taken (City Manager Reports, City Councilmember Comments, Consent Calendar items not pulled for separate consideration, and Future Agenda Items).

The public is invited to attend and provide public comment. Public comments are limited to two minutes per speaker and shall only be taken from those present in City Council Chambers. No remote public comment will be taken during this time unless required by the Brown Act. A total of thirty minutes will be allocated to this initial public participation item. This time allotment may be modified due to time constraints at the discretion of the Mayor or City Council. Another period is also reserved for general comment later in the meeting for those who could not be heard at this time.

No action will be taken on matters raised during public comment, except that the Council may take action to schedule issues raised during public comment for a future agenda. Speakers with comments regarding City management or departmental operations are encouraged to submit those comments directly to the City Manager. Members of the audience will have a future opportunity to speak on items pulled from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion, Public Hearings, and Municipal Matters when those items are heard.

14.

CITY COUNCILMEMBER COMMENTS

14.a

UPDATES FROM CITY COUNCIL AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEES AND STANDING COMMITTEE DELEGATES/ALTERNATES

15.

CONSENT CALENDAR

The following matters will be acted upon collectively with a single motion and vote to approve with the majority consent of the City Council. Councilmembers may orally register a negative vote on any Consent Calendar item without pulling the item for separate consideration before the vote on the Consent Calendar. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember removes an item from the Consent Calendar, either under Approval of the Agenda or under this item before the vote on the Consent Calendar. Items removed for separate discussion will be provided a separate public comment period.

• Recommended Action:

  To approve the consent calendar.

15.a

WAIVE READING IN FULL OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ON THE AGENDA

Recommendation: 
Staff recommends City Council waive reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions on the agenda and declare that said titles which appear on the public agenda shall be determined to have been read by title and further reading waived.

15.b

CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - 25-CCO-027

(City Clerk Myra Maravilla)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council approve the minutes for the April 8, 2025 Regular Meeting, April 22, 2025 Special Meeting (Study Session), April 29, 2025 Special Meeting, and May 5, 2025 Special Meeting.

15.c

ONE APPOINTMENT TO THE BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS - 25-CCO-026

(City Clerk Myra Maravilla)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council appoint one member to the Building Board of Appeals to fill the remainder of an undefined term.

15.d

CHECK REGISTERS - 25-AS-041

(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council receive and file the check registers for the period of April 29, 2025 through May 7, 2025. The Administrative Services Director certifies the accuracy of the demands.

15.e

CASH BALANCE REPORT - 25-AS-037

(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council receive and file the March 2025 Cash Balance Report.

15.f

REVENUE REPORT, EXPENDITURE REPORT, AND CIP REPORT BY PROJECT FOR MARCH 2025 - 25-AS-039

(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council receive and file the March 2025 Financial Reports.

15.g

CITY TREASURER’S REPORT - 25-AS-036

(City Treasurer David Pedersen)

• Recommended Action:

  The City Treasurer recommends City Council receive and file the March 2025 City Treasurer’s Report.

15.h

HERMOSA BEACH LANDSCAPING AND STREET - 25-PW-024

David Grethen

I hope we will indeed have the opportunity address the annual operating deficit during the upcoming fiscal year, as mentioned in the Fiscal Impact section of the Staff report.

CEQA: Determine the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act.
(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Adopt a resolution (Attachment 3) approving the Engineer's Report in connection with Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 2025–2026 made pursuant to the requirements of Resolution No. 25-7474 (Attachment 1); and
  2. Adopt a resolution (Attachment 4) declaring the City’s intention to order certain improvements and to levy and collect assessments within the Hermosa Beach Landscaping and Street Lighting District 2025–2026 for the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026, and appointing June 24, 2025, at the hour of 6:30 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers as the time and place for a public hearing in relation thereto.

15.i

ACTION MINUTES OF THE PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION MEETING - 25-PW-032

(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council receive and file the action minutes of the Public Works Commission meeting of March 19, 2025, and Special Meeting of April 9, 2025.

15.j

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM STATUS REPORT AS OF MAY 16, 2025 - 25-PW-034

(Public Works Director Joe SanClemente)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council receive and file the Capital Improvement Program Status Report as of May 16, 2025.

15.k

ACTION MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 20, 2025 - 25-CDD-087

(Community Development Director Alison Becker)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council receive and file the action minutes of the Planning Commission regular meeting of May 20, 2025.

15.l

PLANNING COMMISSION TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS - 25-CDD-089

(Community Development Director Alison Becker)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council receive and file the June 17, 2025 Planning Commission tentative future agenda.

15.m

ENDORSEMENT OF ARAKELIAN ENTERPRISES, INC’S (DBA ATHENS SERVICES) REQUEST FOR AN ANNUAL RATE ADJUSTMENT TO THE MAXIMUM RATES FOR SOLID WASTE SERVICES - 25-CMO-039

(Environmental Programs Manager Doug Krauss)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council endorse the proposed service rate adjustment from Arakelian Enterprises, Inc. (DBA Athens Services) at amount not to exceed the attached rate schedule effective July 1, 2025.

15.n

ADOPTION OF THE CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH 2025 LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN - 25-CMO-033

David Grethen

Thank you for considering, acknowledging, and including in the LHMP document attachments my February 2024 comments to the draft. David Grethen - Public Works Commission

CEQA: Determine that this report is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) or, in the alternative that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act.
(Emergency Management Coordinator Maurice Wright)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council adopt Resolution (Attachment 2) approving the City of Hermosa Beach 2025 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (Attachment 3).

15.o

SOUTH BAY WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD QUARTERLY SUMMARY - 25-CMO-040

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council receive and file the Quarterly Summaries from the South Bay Workforce Investment Board (SBWIB).

16.

PUBLIC HEARINGS—TO COMMENCE AT 6:30 P.M

16.a

REQUEST FOR A ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT (TA 25-01), PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF TEMPORARY USES AND EVENTS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, AMENDING HERMOSA BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE (HBMC): - 25-CDD-062

Amy Limas

To the City Council, As the fundraising chair for the Mira Costa Bands and Guard Program, I want to express strong support for expanding nonprofit access to event permits in the M-1 zone. In February, our program hosted a fundraising concert and silent auction at a venue in the Cypress Arts District. It was one of our most successful events of the year, with around 80 guests and nearly $10,000 raised to support music education. The space allowed for both indoor music and outdoor conversation, which made the experience more inclusive and enjoyable for all families attending. There were no complaints, and even from the outdoor area, sound levels remained appropriate and well-contained. Events like this show what’s possible when local nonprofits are empowered to use space responsibly and creatively. Please approve the Planning Commission’s recommendations, including the ability to apply for multiple events, the extension of hours, and continued use of outdoor areas under the Temporary Minor Special Event permit. These updates will ensure that Hermosa Beach continues to support the arts and its nonprofit organizations in meaningful, sustainable ways. Thank you for your consideration. Amy Limas Fundraising Chair, Mira Costa Bands and Guard, and Hermosa Beach Resident

Adam Malovani

Dear Mayor, Councilmembers, and Staff, Our small businesses need your help. For over 18 months, we’ve advocated for allowing Temporary Minor Special Events (TMSEPs) in downtown private parking lots—with overwhelming support from the Planning Commission, City Council and residents. Unfortunately, ongoing discussions about the M1/Cypress District are delaying progress on the downtown TMSEP revisions. I am in favor of making it easier and less expensive for ALL businesses to host minor events, but if the Council cannot agree on an M1 plan tonight, I urge you to separate the M1 District and Limited Entertainment Permit from the TMSEP, so downtown businesses can start hosting events in parking lots without further delay. Also, below are a few recommendations related to Parking and the TMSEP. PARKING Concerns: The draft ordinance requires all accessible parking to remain on-site, which is often unsafe or impractical during events. It also mandates a temporary parking demand management plan if more than five spaces are displaced—adding unnecessary time and expense for City Staff and the applicant. Recommendations: Revise to: “All existing accessible parking must be maintained on-site or relocated nearby and clearly designated as accessible.” Revise to: “If any parking spaces are displaced, event organizers must prominently promote alternate transportation options (biking, walking, ride-share, etc.) in all event marketing.” Remove the requirement for a temporary parking demand management plan. The Coastal Commission and our neighboring cities do not require a temporary parking demand management plan for minor events, nor should we. We should be streamlining the permit process, not adding unnecessary requirements that cost the applicant and City staff time. Alternatively, increase the trigger for a temporary parking demand management plan from 6+ spaces displaced to 15+. Thank you for your support! Adam Malovani

Rafael McMaster

As the founder of Indivisible Arts, a 501(c)(3) non-profit that proudly serves the youth and artists of Hermosa Beach through mental and emotional health tools - and providing a safe, creative space for community - I am strongly in agreement with amending the text pertaining to the events and regulations for the Cypress district as a M-1 Light manufacturing zone. Our community art shows - such as our HBEF/Young At Art "Hearts of Hermosa" art show featuring youth work in collaboration with parents a few weeks back - are threads in the social fabric that make our community so beautiful to be a part of. As a non-profit, our intentions are pure - serve Hermosa Beach (and its youth and families) to the best of our ability through creativity, art, and mental health tools. I am strongly for amendments to regulation that allow us to provide these basic events to help support our community, with greater ease and less restriction. Anyone who takes the time to study the financial models of the M-1 businesses on Cypress can easily see that our events aren't trying to turn Cypress into an entertainment district - instead we are trying to support our beloved community through events that promote unity, creativity, kindness, connection, and love. There are a shortage of local spaces in Hermosa Beach to host these small events that are appropriate for families and youth (ie not bars) - and we would like to continue to serve our community by providing a creative event space. This weekend we are hosting Mira Costa's annual art show. The next weekend, we do the same for Da Vinci Design high school. We hope to continue to be able to serve with greater effectiveness and less restriction. Thank you all for your hard work, and consideration in the matter.

Carolyn Petty

The M1 zone was carefully evaluated by our community during the general plan process, which represented thousands of hours of thoughtful community input. This ordinance conflicts with the community vision for the M1 zone. Also, changes of this magnitude should be noticed to everyone within 500 feet because it will result in noise and impacts. What is shocking to me is the city paying $1.3M to settle the Crossfit lawsuit because neighbors ostensibly (later proven to be false, and orchestrated by Councilmember Stacy Armato) complained about noise. In light of that massive settlement (the largest legal settlement in city history aside from the oil lawsuit) how has the city not learned its lesson about carefully evaluating changes to this part of town? Page 5 of the ordinance - Limited events are increasing from 28 to 72. I disagree with this increase in impacts – particularly with zero input from the neighbors. I disagree with allowing alcohol when it was previously prohibited. Amplified sound will now be allowed – but again, no input from the neighbors? Hours are starting earlier as well. Shouldn't the neighbors be aware that events could start at 8am? Temporary Minor Special Events – should NOT be permitted in the M1 Zone. This is outrageous and represents a political favor to one person – Jessica. Nobody in this community – aside from her and Councilmembers Detoy/Jackson – would agree with allowing a business in the M1 zone to host events that have nothing to do with light manufacturing and is written to specifically allow events that exceed the scope of the business. Again – one person, Jessica, owns a business that is illegally hosting events in her business. This was written just for her. Dean’s suggestion regarding square footage makes no sense and cannot be enforced. This whole ordinance should stop, and a chart should be sent to everyone within 500 feet clearly explaining what the zoning currently allows, and what you are proposing. It would be unfair to simply send a form letter advising them of changes to the M1 zone. That is the way Suja operated. Time for transparency and respect for the community.

1) CHAPTER 17.04 REGARDING DEFINITIONS; 2) CHAPTER 17.28 REGARDING M-1 LIGHT MANUFACTURING ZONE; AND 3) CHAPTER 17.42 REGARDING GENERAL PROVISIONS, CONDITIONS, AND EXCEPTIONAL USES.
CEQA: The project qualifies for a Categorical Exemption per Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
(Community Development Director Alison Becker)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Conduct a public hearing to consider amendments to Hermosa Beach Municipal Code pertaining to temporary uses and temporary events; and
  2. Introduce by title only and waive first reading of an Ordinance of the City of Hermosa Beach, California approving Zone Text Amendment (25-01) (Attachment 1).

16.b

CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF A PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL TO MODIFY A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SHARED PARKING PLAN (PARK25-01) AT 1601 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY IN THE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA 8 (SPA-8) ZONE - 25-CDD-068

CEQA: Determine that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act
(Community Development Director Alison Becker)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Consider Parking Plan Amendment (PARK25-01) to allow for the consolidation of four retail tenant units totaling 5,368 square feet into two units, and to allow the activation of 1,203 square feet of previously non-leased common space into new leasable office or retail space without providing additional parking at 1601 Pacific Coast Highway in the Specific Plan Area 8 zone, subject to conditions of approval, and provide direction as desired; and
  2. Determine that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
  3. Adopt a Resolution (Attachment 1) approving Parking Plan Amendment (PARK25-01), subject to conditions of approval.

17.

MUNICIPAL MATTERS

17.a

A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AN AT-WILL EMPLOYMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH STEVEN NAPOLITANO FOR INTERIM CITY MANAGER AND APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE SALARY TABLE - 25-AS-042

Howard Lee

Council: FOR, FOR, FOR. Ignore the non-sense of the die-hard “AGAIST-ers” (who just don’t get it). This is an absolute no-brainer choice. Cut to the chase and make Steven Napolitano the new “permanent” City Manager, ASAP. No need to waste more tax money on a consultant and a 6-month idiot-process like the one that brought us the former dear-in-headlights, costly City Manager. Should be a 5-0 vote to approve as “Interim City Manager”. Howard Lee

Laura Pena

Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Staff - I support a hiring process that utilizes best practices. As you consider appointing an interim City Manager, I respectfully ask that this be viewed not just as a staffing decision, but as a chance to set a new standard for performance, transparency, and long-term accountability in our city. This isn’t personal, it’s professional. We are asking for a system that links leadership to results we can all see and measure. That’s why I strongly encourage the City Council to adopt a performance-based contract for the incoming interim City Manager, something grounded in best practices and clearly aligned with the vision outlined in PLAN Hermosa’s Governance Element. Here are three key components I recommend: 1. Annual Reviews Based on Pre-Approved Metrics: Evaluate performance through clear benchmarks like project delivery, financial stewardship, and responsiveness to Council and community goals. Any agenda items addressing these matters should be conducted at a reasonable hour so the public can thoughtfully weigh in. 2. A Public-Facing Performance Dashboard: Make progress visible. A dashboard aligned with Policy 8.1 – Community Indicators would allow residents to monitor how the city is progressing toward shared goals in real time. 3. Resident Satisfaction Surveys Tied to Incentives: If bonuses are included, they should be based in part on public feedback. This reinforces the principle that city leadership serves the public first and foremost. These recommendations are not abstract, they directly support PLAN Hermosa’s Governance Goals: • Goal 1: Promote transparency and integrity in the decision-making process. Your decisions, including this one should reflect Policy 1.1: Open Meetings, ensuring that the community is able to understand and participate in how leadership is evaluated and held accountable. • Policy 1.6: Long-Term Considerations. Let’s avoid short-term fixes. Implementing a performance-based approach now will yield long-term benefits in leadership culture, community trust, and fiscal sustainability. • Goal 8: A Performance-Based Management and Benchmarking Program. We already have the policy framework in place. Let’s start using it, public metrics, standards, and community indicators to guide leadership evaluations from this point forward. We are at a turning point. This is a chance to re-establish trust, modernize how we evaluate executive performance, and lead by example. Many of us in the community are asking for accountability, clarity, and a professional standard that reflects the values outlined in our own General Plan. Please consider these practices as you move forward. They’re not just good governance, they’re already our stated policy. I appreciate your thoughtful consideration. Laura Pena

Raymond Dussault

Tonight, the Hermosa Beach City Council will vote to appoint long-time South Bay local Steve Napolitano as our interim city manager. Some of the same voices who supported Suja Lowenthal are now protesting that we should conduct a lengthy interview process. But let’s be clear: there is no legal or procedural requirement for a broad search or multiple interviews — not for an interim appointment and not even for a permanent hire. Just like Suja’s hiring, this appointment simply requires a majority vote of the council. And let’s not forget: Steve Napolitano was already thoroughly vetted during the previous search, and many were surprised when he wasn’t selected. That decision raised eyebrows then — especially among residents who believed Lowenthal was chosen not for her fit with the community, but because the then-majority council (all relatively new to town and well-connected elites) wanted someone who would help reshape our beach town into something more aligned with their urban vision. Steve Napolitano is not that. He’s a highly qualified, deeply experienced local who understands Hermosa’s unique culture and values. This appointment puts us on far firmer footing — with someone who knows and respects the community he serves.

Bob Wolfe

A FLAWED PROCESS My objections to this secretive deal to hire Steve Napolitano as interim HB city manager concern process, not personality. We now know that Suja Lowenthal, Hermosa’s highly-regarded city manager, was constructively terminated in secret, without cause and without public explanation, and in a deplorable display of fiscal irresponsibility by councilmembers, who ostensibly claim to be protectors of the public fisc. The same flawed process is being repeated by this scheme to replace Suja with Steve. Steve has had zero interviews with all five councilmembers. Has he had private, undisclosed conversations with some of them? That’s unknown. I served as the hiring partner of a major downtown law firm before transitioning to the Court of Appeal as a supervising judicial attorney. I learned, from practical experience, that prehiring interviews are some of the most important aspects of the employment process. A screening interview presents the optimal time to explore an applicant’s skills, experience, critical thinking and personality, and to address expectations, strategic planning skills, effective communication, and the ability to lead, motivate and direct city employees. There have been no screening interviews for Steve Napolitano. This does a disservice to all five councilmembers, to residents and to Steve himself. It is surprising that he is willing to take on this job under such a cloud, and without a two-way, collaborative dialogue with all five councilmembers. Premature commitments and impulsive actions are not a good way to start. It is in everyone’s interest to secure a replacement city manager, whether interim or permanent, who will unite the community and enhance the city’s image and authority. Steve’s position on short-term vacation rentals (STVRs) presents an important example of the importance of a prescreening interview. On Aug. 1, 2024, Steve issued a 9-page decision as an administrative hearing officer, where he dismissed a citation against a 28-unit apartment house owner for allowing one-night stays in his units, rather than offering monthly apartment rentals, as required by Hermosa’s STVR ordinance. In what I believe to be an action in excess of his authority as a hearing officer, Steve ruled Hermosa’s ordinance against STVRs in residential zones to be invalid, although he recognized that “many issues at play here remain unresolved and/or unrealized” as “beyond the scope of evidence and argument in this case.” As to STVRs, a prescreening interview is essential to make sure that Steve understands the critical difference between his former role as a hearing officer and his potential role as a city manager, whether interim or permanent. The Coastal Commission itself recognizes the importance of affordability within the coastal zone. It is well-established that short-term vacation rentals will have a drastic effect upon affordable rents for Hermosa within a desirable beach community like Hermosa as landlords will go for the bigger bucks to be gained from daily or weekend rentals as opposed to monthly apartments. It is the job of a city manager to investigate and articulate such impacts. Moreover, unlike Manhattan Beach, Hermosa does not have a blanket prohibition under STVRs; instead, it expressly allows them in commercial zones. Moreover, Hermosa is unique among the beach cities in having an operational youth hostel, thereby directly addressing the Coastal Commission’s affordability goals. Does Steve understand these concerns, particularly about the importance in a city with such a large proportion of long-term renters, of preserving this type of affordable housing for residents and potential residents who cannot even dream of purchasing a home here? Will Steve instead unduly defer to those councilmembers who have a self-interest in offering short-term rentals for those additional housing units which they own? These are legitimate questions. To repeat, my concerns involve process, not qualifications. I publicly endorsed Steve’s unsuccessful campaign last November for superior court judge against deputy public defender George Turner. But that was a comparative contest, with numerous opportunities for Steve to interact with the hiring authority: L.A. County voters. And he clearly was the superior candidate. To my great regret, with this backroom deal, a few councilmembers are depriving Steve of the same opportunity to showcase his collaborative skills. We can do better.

Ann Gotthoffer

This resolution is nothing but blatant cronyism without even the trappings of anything close to a legitimate hiring process. You have appointed an Interim City Manager, Joe SanClemente, who should continue to serve while a legitimate search and interview process is undertaken. To vote to appoint someone who apparently has not interviewed with the full Council is insulting to all of us. Will the new interim manager then lead the “search” to fill the position that he is likely being steamrolled in to secure, or will you not even bother with the pretense of a search to find the best candidate? I haven’t had anything against Steve personally. In fact, I was very touched with his remarks at the dedication of Bruce Beach in MB where he apologized personally when his City would not. However, I am extremely disappointed that he would participate in this back door deal that reeks of impropriety without any semblance of a fair process. The fact he apparently emailed the Council to advise them of being contacted about the position before Suja was pushed out, does not excuse agreeing to be appointed under these circumstances. He will never be able to speak with an independent voice, or lead with any credibility in my opinion. It says a lot about his character, or lack thereof, that he would agree to be a pawn in this scheme. I am also disappointed in Mayor Saemann, who I know and respected. I believed him to be a man that would want to “go by book” - have respect for proper procedures. I can only assume that he has been swayed by another Council member who does not have the best interest of our City at heart. This compounds my dismay, frustration and sadness for what you are doing here tonight. Please vote no on this sham appointment. It is not too late to try and do things the right way going forward. Ann Gotthoffer, Hermosa resident over 45 years.

Robert Fortunato

Honorable Mayor Saemann and Councilmembers, We are writing to express our deep concern regarding the recent actions and decisions that appear to undermine the integrity of our city’s leadership. First, you cost taxpayers approximately $150,000 in severance pay, in addition to significant disruption, when you attempted to fire our city manager without cause. Now, in a closed-door session, it seems you are trying to push through the appointment of an unqualified and conflicted candidate with no municipal city manager experience or relevant education. Furthermore, Napolitano adjudicated against our city in a case involving short-term rentals—one of the most pressing issues in our community. Will he need to recuse himself from any further activities on this matter, potentially leading to more costs and disruption? Or is the disruption the point? Is this a move to benefit Keegan, the individual with a known history of dishonesty, who owns vacation rentals in Hermosa Beach and stands to profit by circumventing the 30-day Short-Term Vacation Rental (STVR) rule? Our city has worked hard to preserve that rule to keep rents affordable for our neighbors and to prevent the proliferation of party houses that damage the quality of life in our community. This backroom, self-serving deal is not in line with the values of Hermosa Beach. What we deserve is an open, competitive City Manager recruitment process. I strongly urge you to reinstall Joe SanClamente as interim City Manager or hire a retired city manager who can facilitate such a process without conflicts of interest. Councilmembers Francois and Mayor Saemann, I ask you not to follow the agenda of someone with a self-serving agenda. This move suggests you are complicit in a backroom deal that undermines the well-being of our community. It signals that you are willing to exacerbate rent increases, and allow party houses to proliferate in every neighborhood. If you were on the other side of the dais, we believe you would have stood up against this. Please do not let this decision define your legacy. The choice is yours tonight. We hope you will make the right decision for the future of Hermosa Beach and call for an open process for the selection of the interim and permanent city manager. Respectfully, Robert & Monica Fortunato

Claudia Berman

Over a 5-week period, Keegan, Francois, and Saemann coordinated to remove city manager Lowenthal and install former MB council member/judicial candidate Napolitano. The timeline would have been 4 weeks if a special meeting were legally allowed. This occurred through 3 closed sessions and will conclude with finalizing Napolitano's interim city manager contract on 5/27 in open session. What we know: • Lowenthal's termination was not performance-related, and she'll receive 6 months’ severance per her contract. • After the May 13th closed session for item “DISCUSS AND GIVE DIRECTION REGARDING THE SEARCH FOR AND APPOINTMENT OF INTERIM CITY MANAGER” 1) Detoy walked out citing transparency, honesty, and integrity concerns 2) Jackson motioned to make the discussion public but Keegan, Francois, and Saemann refused. • There were only 4 days between the forced “resignation” of city manager Lowenthal and the closed session where Keegan, Francois, and Saemann selected Napolitano for interim city manager. • No public search was initiated for the interim city manager position. • No interview or vetting process occurred for Napolitano. • More due diligence is given to volunteer commissioner appointments than this position overseeing a $94M budget. What we can theorize: • The termination of Lowenthal and the installation of Napolitano was an orchestrated end-to-end process. • Keegan, Francois, and Saemann selected Napolitano for the interim city manager position in a “offline” process resulting in a pre-arranged deal. • Given the speed and lack of transparency, this process included one or more serial meetings among Keegan, Francois, and Saemann. This appears to be a willful disregard of the Brown Act to a level that the District Attorney may find cause to investigate. Key Questions: Hiring Process: • When was Napolitano approached about the interim/permanent position(s) and by whom? Provide all dates and contacts. • Why the rush to hire someone with no city government experience beyond council service? • Why ignore standard hiring practices? Council Motivations: • What drives Keegan, Francois, and Saemann's rush to install Napolitano? Do they want someone indebted to them, easier to control, and/or prefer a more “comfortable”, "good ol' boys" arrangement with a white man over the previous woman of color? Conflict of Interest: • How will Napolitano handle STVR conflicts? He previously ruled against Hermosa Beach as hearing officer in an STVR case. Keegan could profit significantly if STVR enforcement weakens or residential bans are overturned, especially given neighbors report he operated illegal STVRs before joining council.

Ira Ellman

Paying Napolitano $240,000 to be Interim City Manager and then likely the permanent City Manager is the final result of the apparent conspiracy by Keegan, Francois and Seemann. They wanted to get rid of an experienced, successful woman to be replaced by someone just like them: An older white guy…….What makes this even more sinister is that his salary is only 17% less than the recently terminated city manager. She has decades of such experience, let alone over 7 years in Hermosa, where she built an incredibly solid management team, including an amazing HBPD, excellent morale and a stellar record of accomplishments and related performance reviews. She had the support of this management team, civic leaders (those who do the work on commissions rather than those who just complain), religious leaders, Hermosa school leadership and business owners. Napolitano has zero experience in working full time in any city government. He wants this job badly, including sending a desperate email less than 24 hours before the closed session where Lowenthal was likely fired. Napolitano stated that he had been contacted by many over recent weeks about the City Manager position. $240.000 No interview, no competition, no reasons given for termination, no performance review of Lowenthal…..looks like an inside job. Lots of closed sessions and zero transparency or logic disclosed. My guess is that Lowenthal haters Francois and/or Keegan (and likely a few former council members and other haters) approached Seemann about terminating Lowenthal and told him that Napolitano was waiting in the wings which would help a smooth transition during his time as mayor. Where are the supposed financially responsible Council Members Keegan, Francois and Seemann (and others like the local campaign financier), who essentially fired Lowenthal? The city will be paying double City Manager salary for a number of months (due to the severance being paid to Lowenthal), while getting someone learning on the job. If they do decide to hire a search firm and not slam dunk Napolitano into the position, tens of thousands dollars more will also be expended. The City’s ability and knowledge to get millions of dollars of grants is already lost with Lowenthal’s termination and Angela Crepsi’s departure. And then there is the $240,000 per year.

Nancy Schwappach

I don't know Steve but have reviewed his resume and think he is a great choice for interim City Manager. He knows the South Bay, has experience with the Coastal Commission and Coastal Act, understands the legal regime around the Housing Element and seems to know how to manage a budget. Good choice.

Carolyn Petty

Thank you for realizing the importance of having a City Manager who understands and respects the Hermosa Beach culture. For the past 7 years we had a CM who did everything in her power to undo what made our town special. We need someone like Steve who grew up in the South Bay. He worked for the (beloved) County Supervisor Don Knabe for years, so he also has solid experience. I have to point out that Suja's prior experience was being an environmental manager. She was not qualified for the CM role. Steve's resume is deep and impressive and is much more extensive than hers. I even think he may actually show up for work! Maybe he’ll take the $70,000 worth of plate glass down so people can actually talk to him. What a breath of fresh air he will be. Good idea and good choice.

(Human Resources, Cynthia Stafford)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council approve a resolution for an at-will employment services agreement with Steven Napolitano for Interim City Manager and update the salary table to reflect a change in the salary for the City Manager (Attachments 1 and 2).

17.b

PURCHASE OF PORTABLE BARRIERS AND TRAILER FROM ADVANCED SECURITY TECHNOLOGIES - 25-PD-007

Nancy Schwappach

During the discussion of the St Patrick's Day Parade I recall a Councilmember suggested reaching out to Manhattan Beach and/or Redondo Beach to see if they were interested in "sharing" traffic barricades. Are those what this requisition is about? If so, was there outreach to MB and RB? And where will the trailer/ barricades be physically stored when not in use?

(Police Chief Landon Phillips)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council:

  1. Appropriate $44,598 in the Grant Fund for the State Homeland Security Program 2022 Grant Cycle and add estimated revenue of $44,598 in the Grants Fund; and
  2. Authorize the purchase of portable barriers and trailer, through a national purchasing cooperative, in total amount of $109,534.

17.c

RECEIVE AND FILE AN INFORMATIONAL UPDATE ON THE RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT PROGRAM. - 25-AS-043

Tahlia Crabtree

Good evening, Mayor and Council Members. I'm making a comment regarding an unintended consequence of the current residential parking permit requirements that's affecting myself and likely other legitimate Hermosa Beach residents. I relocated from New Zealand for a full time, permanent role, and found a gorgeous home in Hermosa with 3 other wonderful roommates. I am on the lease, I pay rent, I receive mail, and am establishing my life here as a contributing member of this community. However, I cannot obtain a residential parking permit because I don't yet own a vehicle. As someone relocating internationally, purchasing a car represents a significant financial commitment that I'm working toward, but currently I lease my car. The current program requires a California driver's license with a local address AND vehicle registration to that same address. This creates a gap for residents like myself who are legitimate tenants but don't own vehicles registered in their name. I’m very mindful that the intention behind the program’s current regulation is to serve actual residents and prevent abuse of the permit system. But in this case, the policy is penalizing people like myself who have different financial requirements, whether that be renting a car temporarily, saving up to buy one, or trying to make a new life in a country on their own. What is confusing is that there is an exception to the permit system for student drivers, who are allowed to use a car owned and registered to their out-of-state parents. That means if you are a student with parents who can afford to provide you a car, you qualify for a permit - but if you are an adult trying to make it on your own with a temporary car situation, you’re ineligible. That feels inequitable, and I know that is not in the spirit of the policy. Additionally, we have a 4 bedroom apartment with four working adults. We rely on the guest permit for visiting friends and family, caretakers, and service providers - it’s unsustainable to have the guest pass be the primary permit for a resident. I’m asking for a thoughtful and compassionate look at making a fair solution to residents who may not own their vehicles, but still live and contribute to this community. Thank you for considering my comment, and for your service to the community.

CEQA: Determine that any modification to the Citywide Residential Parking Program is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act.
(Administrative Services Director Brandon Walker)

• Recommended Action:

  Staff recommends City Council receive and file an update on the City’s Residential Parking Permit Program.  

18.

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

This is the time for Councilmembers to schedule future agenda items and to ask questions about the status of previously approved future agenda items. No discussion, debate, or public comment will be taken. Councilmembers should consider the city's work plan when considering new items. The tentative future agenda items document is provided for information only. 

18.a

TENTATIVE FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS - 25-CMO-041

Attached is the current list of tentative future agenda items for Council’s information.

19.

PUBLIC COMMENT

This time is set aside for the public to address the Council on any item of interest within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Council that could not be heard under the first public comment opportunity because there were too many prior public speakers and the thirty-minute maximum time limit was exhausted. 

20.

ADJOURNMENT